asans 0 Posted January 6, 2001 Amy:The 3 photos that you shows in photo.net are good, but i think you should improve them if the light was more contrastly, with some parts of the body lights and others more dark. Antoni Sans Link to comment
jasonschock 0 Posted March 3, 2001 I would have liked to see your feet in the shot. Not always easy to line up self-portraits, though, I know. Link to comment
twmeyer 0 Posted April 3, 2001 Amy... in addition to the feet and hands issue, which are really important to any subtext of this image, less fill light would add some mystery. This type of lighting would be good for some sort of instructional manual, like Yoga in the Shower for Busy Women. In fact, she looks like she's doing the Breath of Fire. Perhaps printing the whole image darker, so the highlight on her shoulder dominats the tonal scale, might make the image alot more engaging... t Link to comment
clementine_b 0 Posted April 4, 2001 I wish she weren't sucking in her stomach so sharply. It makes her seem too self-conscious. Link to comment
w_efajan 0 Posted April 15, 2001 If her feet and hands were included, she would have looked like she was trying to push her way out of the picture frame. It doesn't look like that's what the photographer wanted. Link to comment
w_efajan 0 Posted April 24, 2001 In regard to the comment "hands and feet": BALONEY! This is not a photo for which the convention fits. Well done Ms Powers. Link to comment
pd 0 Posted May 14, 2001 This and the pool shot done with self timer are my favorites in all your folder. The ruffled up hair in this realy gets me.It would have been nice to see some toes,but I guess that's just my thing.well done. Link to comment
w_efajan 0 Posted June 22, 2001 In response to the sarcasm "what is baloney?", it is the informal corruption of "balogna" and can be found in modern dictionaries. If you are not being sarcastic, and would like to know, it is a euphemism for "bulls--t". Link to comment
johnanewton 0 Posted July 30, 2001 Hi Amy. I feel the only thing lacking in your self portraits is a photographer, Its hard to work out where you are in the frame, if your not there. Try to engage with the camera, the missing link in so many of the photos on this site, If you dont want people to know what you look like , I dont see why your taking these photos or come to that showing them. Link to comment
joel_nelson 0 Posted July 31, 2001 Maybe I'm easy to please, but I think the way she used her hair in this is great. I dont care about sucking in the stomach, you can see that as intentional as far as the message of the photo or not. The overall pose is very good as well, I especially like the combination between leaning and pushing on the wall. Link to comment
rob_mccool 0 Posted August 5, 2001 because you can't be your own. you have a great body and i think a lot of talent- but did you really mean to cut off your hands and feet? I don't think you would have done that if you were looking thru the viewfinder at someone else. it was an accident you made running over to pose before the timer went off. anyway- i can't blame you. i model for myself and i don't look half as good:) Link to comment
mark_a 0 Posted August 8, 2001 Amy, Nice work. As a variation how about a little water on the model to add some shine and depth? I have to admit that I would have like to seen the hands and feet in the shot too, but I do like it the way it is. There is a lot of emotion in the photo that draws you in - - you can almost feel the cold tiles. Keep up the great work. Link to comment
carl_testa1 0 Posted August 17, 2001 I like the hair and your sense of mystery by not showing your face. It leaves a little to the imagination.As far as the hands and feet I get the idea without seeing them completely.I feel you captured what you wanted or your photo wouldn't be on display. Great photo. Carl Testa Link to comment
brian_greenway 0 Posted September 2, 2001 I definitely think you have an interesting and pleasing figure and you are doing the right thing by putting them on display. I think that the whole reason for you composing the collection is the fact that they are all self portraits and the fact that you make that known is all the more justifying. Perhaps the fact that each photo's composition is not entirely "perfect", adds to the beauty of the pictures. This makes them different and thus all the more interesting. Additionally, I agree with Carl Testa in that if you were not happy about having cut some hands and feet out, then you would have placed it in the collection. You could have easily re-shot it, had you wanted to. Thank you for sharing your amazing and very real figure. Can I also say that this and your waternude picture are my favourite in your folder. Link to comment
aram_langhans 0 Posted September 8, 2001 I love your work. I especially like the shots where the light is coming through the slightly opened doors. Excellent work. Link to comment
jasmine_obrien 0 Posted November 5, 2001 A powerful photo but the ankle bracelet spoils it. Link to comment
patrick_michel_dagenais 0 Posted November 7, 2001 Anyone who says that you can't really do profesionnal photography with digital cameras should look at Amy Power's work and reconsider. Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted January 15, 2002 this is pure beauty, the image is very graphically powerful, i love the lines in it. the lack of hands and feet adds to the originality of the image - makes it interesting. good work. :) Link to comment
richard_simon 0 Posted April 14, 2002 Lovely Amy!!!! Question, since you were there and we were not, it seems to me to include the hands or feet would have added the wall and the floor which would take away from the photograph. 9/9 Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now