marcadamus 1 Posted February 27, 2006 Well, it's not reciprocity failure. It couldn't be as it is a digital capture. The 'tones' look accurate to me, purposely dark due to the ND filter. The streaked clouds are the result of motion during a 3-minute exposure. Link to comment
kahkityoong 0 Posted February 27, 2006 Thanks for the info. The streaked clouds complement the blurred water well. I presume the dark rocks in the midzone are the subjects of 'Transformation'. Link to comment
marcadamus 1 Posted February 27, 2006 No, "Transformation" was taken 200 miles away on Oregon's North Coast at a different time. The rocks do look similar though. Link to comment
jana 1 Posted February 27, 2006 Your velvet is soothing my mind... beautiful beyond words, heers Jana Link to comment
Guest Guest Posted February 28, 2006 I've always wondered how folks judge an accurate exposure in bulb mode, presumably you use some form of light meter? (Or was it trial and error with the histogram?) Link to comment
ianflindt 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Marc, Your artistry - and Adam's (Burton) - set the standards to which I aspire but which I'm realistic enough to realize I will in all probability never reach. You have an unerring ability to make images that stir the spirit and sooth the soul. You have a remarkable talent. Ian Link to comment
will king 0 Posted February 28, 2006 Who's the idiot that rated this a 3/3? I'm not against anonymous ratings but this is clearly ratings abuse caused by jealously. Link to comment
marcadamus 1 Posted February 28, 2006 They went through every image in my portfolio and rated it a 3/3 also. This includes images not even entered for critique! I have addressed my complaints with the administration. I will be expecting a reply from them soon. Link to comment
marcadamus 1 Posted February 28, 2006 The administration has dealt with the abusive ratings. Link to comment
will king 0 Posted March 1, 2006 Marc, I noticed that some anonymous coward rated one of my photos a 3/3 as well. The strange thing is, it was rated anonymously after almost 2 days of being posted for critique. I also noticed that this photo was posted for quite some time before it got hit with an anonymous 3/3. How is this possible? I thought after a period of time, photos were immune from anonymous ratings. Did administration give you any clues to what's going on? Link to comment
marcadamus 1 Posted March 1, 2006 No, unfortunately they were not forthcoming with that information. I suggested some soft of manipulation/hacking of the system. They rated some of my images never even posted to the critique forum! Link to comment
kahkityoong 0 Posted March 13, 2006 Marc, do you ever get any problems with noise and banding on longish exposures like this even on ISO 100 with the 5D? Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now