blowingsky 0 Posted February 7, 2006 I'm a sucker for blurry motion shots that forward a kind of impressionistic mode of "observing the everyday". And this shot is a high-class version, without a doubt. Your whole portfolio aims high and succeeds. But just now I am wondering if I haven't bought into an "art for art's sake" sensibility. In college (late 60's) I held forth in pubs that Thomas Merton was full of shit when he said "all art caves in upon itself" because I felt that art was a mirror on our true spiritual nature, suppressed and confused as it might be. But in these corruptible times I wonder if maybe some of it does cave in, pointing back only to the dissolution of matter and time. And an image that forces a subjective response from the viewer (such as yours) evokes only their occlusion--the system of their hell--without any liberating recognition. This is not a criticism of your fine image. It just provoked some thought. I apologize for going on if it seems off topic. Link to comment
lutz 3 Posted February 7, 2006 Peter, if my sketchy Digital Diary snap provoked some thoughts in you, I'm more than happy. Art is a very heavy category to cast on what I collect along my ways, IMHO. I'm after visuals that would stop me --and you-- and make us look twice for a mix of both, beauty and truth. You may call that art. I'd just call it a subjective mirror of what strikes my attention, curiosity, visual sensitivity. Thanks for stopping by and taking your time to share your thoughts!Feel free to download my recent desktop version: Link to comment
blowingsky 0 Posted February 8, 2006 In some quarters art has been made to seem a ponderous subject with immensely complicated convolutions, ramifications and nuances and can only be addressed via an arcane coda that only a secret member of the art priesthood can interpret to the masses. But your photo blows all that out of the water. Art is basic, simple, true. But getting there takes a lot of discipline, talent and technique and what I'd call (for want of a better term) a "fullness of viewpoint." Which is exactly what makes you and I stop and take another look at your image. As a note, I prefer the posted version to the desktop version. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now