Jump to content

***


romberg

KIEV 88TTL. ILFORD XP2.400


From the category:

Portrait

· 170,141 images
  • 170,141 images
  • 582,352 image comments




Recommended Comments

Real fine photo. The B&W is a beautiful addition on your great model.

Nois is no problem here.

Indeed, to continu in squaire is real great!

Link to comment
Amazing... Really stunning, can't wait the day I can have the skill to take a photo like this. Truly remarkable
Link to comment

I am sorry to be a critic but...

 

The really good thing that exists in this photo is the model. The setting is not correct according to my criterion and assurance that of different many people. If we change to the model it would not be the same thing ... 5/5

Link to comment
realy one of the most beautiful portrait i have never seen in photo.net, it's not a beautiful snap for the amzing model but the tone and the location are very very interesting. congratulation 7/7. claudio
Link to comment
this is a nice photo, but you definitely have a great model on your hands, use her as much as you can, she has those eyes, remarkably beautiful eyes, where do you live? can i borrow your model?
Link to comment

Is it me or is this exquisite portrait dull and flat. There are no bright highlights or full blacks. It seems to me that it would greatly benefit from a bit more contrast. It does however have a very soft and gentle look to it, but this is negated by the white "Bokeh" above her head.

 

These norhtern european women are almost as beautiful as those from northern India and Myanmar, IMHO

 

Also, I do love those east block/ Ukrainian lenses!

 

Cheers

 

 

 

Link to comment

I hate to be crass about this, but you guys are just lusting after the girl.

Yes , I too think the picture is nice- by way of default. In other words

Mr Romberg did'nt do anything wrong to screw up this portrait. But the reason

that the shot is so strong is-,its the girl- stupid!

In addition to that I'd like to say that , Romberg used the right lense,

and the correct exposure , and he has the sense to know when to take a picture. But who would'nt under these circumstances?

 

Why I'd go so far as to say that, you could take a picture of this girl

with a throw away camera, and still have something good to look at.

Yes , film is by far the way to go. The reasons are to me is the different

characteristics and personality that film offers. I do not have much exprience

with digital, but organic is always more rich and flavorful. If you don't believe that, take another look at the girl in the protrait.

Please, I do not mean to offend the young woman in the picture.

Its just my observation.

 

one more thing. Mr. Romberg, beautiful!

Link to comment
Just beautiful. The swirl of the oof trees is fabulous so I don't like the crops offered above - I don't know if there's a way of losing the (in my view) slightly excess headroom without losing some of that effect? If there isn't, don't bother!
Link to comment

Outstanding model, pose, personality, framing, contrast and grain. Stunningly beautiful. But I think the oof bokeh is not very attractive, especially the cluster of light at top right of the model's head, the bokeh is harsh and detracts from the otherwise beautiful portrait. You can easily crop out those oof lights, though I think the balance of the original will be diminished but what you gain by eliminating the ugly bokeh will more than compensate what you lose in your original composition.

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...