Northern Lights with Moon

Keep the moon or lose the moon, what do you think? You can see more

in the folder without the moon.

I don't mind the moon there -- it's interesting, but I think it might be more compelling without it. The other shots without the moon I don't think are quite as nice.

I do rather like the second one with the tower, but I wish there was more of the tower to give it some context and perspective.

Definitely without the moon.

I placed the same photo in the northern lights folder with the moon taken out. Easier to compare it that way.

http://photos.imageevent.com/stay_or_go/newenglandphotos/small/NL_00_with_no_moon.jpg

Without the moon. It definitely draws the eyes away from the Northern Lights, the true subject of your photo. Maybe wait until the Northern Lights appear when the moon's behind you, and try to get a little moon-glow in the scenery.

I vote for no moon. Without telling me it's the moon, it could be any light. The pics stronger without it.

Moon? Looks like an oncoming express train! If you want a moon (and I agree it would add to the photo), better try for one that looks more lunar.

I did not add the moon, it was there. In the second pic, I cropped it out.

 

Thanks to all for your comments. I am still not sure which one I like better.

Keep the moon! Night sky gazing is all about conjunctions and occultations and eclipses. The more elements in the picture the more mystical and astrologically significant it becomes. Without the moon its just an astrophysical phenomenon

Really great composition.

WOW!!!! This whole folder is awesome. We are coming up for our 25 aniversary this next year...and are trying to figure out when would be the best time.

I like the moon. Gives it a complete feeling.

The trouble with your cropped moon-less version is that you also eliminate some of the trees that frame and add depth to your shot. I'm giving you a nine for originality on account of your braving the -30'C temperature. Most people would have chickened out. :-)