tacocharly 0 Posted December 17, 2001 i have posted a similar question about a not so similar picture before. i asked for some criticism from a photographer i highly respect, and he thought that the few pictures that i showed him should have been cropped. not concerned with technical quality, blurrieness, but he thought that this would be a more effective picture as one of just the guy in the center. my style has been to show as much of a scene as possible, to give context, and tell the story, also, i think its more interesting to have lots of 'minipictures' within one image. what do you think? would it be more effective if i hadnt gotten the other 'distractions'? what do you think henri cartier bresson or tony dummett sould have done? heres the critique request from the other picture that i had similar question about, although it is totally different, i disagreed with a few others over wether the shot should be more focused http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=001p6d and if its down, try http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=471572 thanks -ethan Link to comment
eric braswell 0 Posted December 18, 2001 I think you absolutely need the context, just maybe not all of what you have here. Without the other people it loses too much meaning. The guy on the far right is distracting, though. How about this crop (attached)? Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now