jam50 0 Posted November 26, 2005 A bunch of critiques wouldn't be the same without my standard waterfall photo. Do your worst. Link to comment
dougie 0 Posted November 26, 2005 Having looked at many long exposures of waterfalls, this is one of the stand-out best. The exposure is so accurate and works with the movement of the water. Grand quality indeed. Link to comment
kslonaker 0 Posted November 26, 2005 Very nice - I think the angles work well to frame the waterfall. It almost glows in the center of the darkness. Link to comment
mackey 0 Posted December 1, 2005 This composition kicks ass with its left vs. right / light vs. dark arrangement. The lead-in from the lower right corner is perfect. The flowing water speaks for itself. I would, however, like to see just a tad more midtones form the dark areas. Also I think a shift of 2-3 degrees counterclockwise might give strength to the opper third without compromising the impact of the image, but this shift may ruin the previously discussed lead-in. Just a nitpick, sorry! I'm sure I would be silenced were I to see the full-size print properly framed. Can you tell us how this has otherwise been "manipulated?" What shutter speed/f-stop? Cheers. Link to comment
jam50 0 Posted December 2, 2005 Thanks for the praise and the suggestions! This was done at an ISO 100, f/22 at 0.4 sec. The only post-processing I did was to bump the saturation up a bit and sharpen it slightly. I haven't printed it yet, just too much going on, but I'm anxious. Thanks again! Link to comment
palmi 0 Posted December 4, 2005 Very nice fall photo James. The waterfall is macical. Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now