doug_brightwell1 Posted May 6, 2001 Share Posted May 6, 2001 I sometimes shoot landscapes right at sunset and dusk, and have needed exposures of 4, 15, even 30 seconds particularly with a polarizing filter cutting down the light. Fuji says that exposures over 2 seconds are not recommended. How does NPS handle reciprocity at longer exposures? What effects would I notice that make it "not recommended?" Is it simply a matter of a color shift that's easily corrected in PhotoShop? Any idea what the reciprocity factor would be at those longer exposure times? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edward_c._nemergut Posted May 6, 2001 Share Posted May 6, 2001 Hmmmm.... I don't know. I'm not exactly sure why you would choose a film designed for weddingsand portraits for sunset landscapes (with a polarizer!) I've heard ofpeople using NPS to shoot snow and sand landscapes (where the film'slower contrast can be helpful) but not the situation you'vedescribed. Personally, I'd choose Provia 100F or Velvia for such andapplication--maybe Supra 100 if I need a CN-41 film. All those filmshave better reciprocity characteristics. Sorry to be so blunt, but it sounds to me like you are trying to forcea square peg into a round hole... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdc Posted May 7, 2001 Share Posted May 7, 2001 I have never used NPS so I can't comment on what to expect. <p>but..<p>I'm not sure why anyone would would suggest Velvia for a long exposure -- green sunsets? For print film you might try Portra 160/400vc they have good reciprocity characteristics, NPL or 100T (test NPL first It works best around 80-100iso IMHO) are very good on long exposures and are also pretty saturated. I don't know what to suggest for chrome, the color bias is such a personal thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doug_brightwell1 Posted May 8, 2001 Author Share Posted May 8, 2001 The main criteria was a color negative film that�s available in 4x5 single sheet readyloads that has a long exposure range and can handle high contrast subjects. Portra 160vc, which I normally shoot in standard film holders, is not yet available in single sheet readyloads. I thought since NPS is used a lot for weddings, and weddings are typically shot in MF, that someone on this forum might have some experience with longer exposures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete_andrews Posted May 8, 2001 Share Posted May 8, 2001 The 'S' in NPS stands for short (exposure time). NPL is designed for longer exposures, but it's also tungsten balanced. Maybe NPL with the appropriate filter would be a better choice for long exposure times.<br>I've never tested these two films in such a situation, but the general effect of reciprocity failure is that exposures need to be extended beyond that which a straightforward lightmeter reading suggests, and a colour cast.<br>The colour cast might be of a type that's easily correctible in printing, or may be of the 'crossed curves' type, which isn't fully correctible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edward_c._nemergut Posted May 8, 2001 Share Posted May 8, 2001 J D C, I'm suprised that you haven't used Velvia for long exposures:I've used it up to 20 seconds to photograph sunsets *without* a CCfilter for years. In fact, John Shaw reports using Velvia upto 1 minute (!) in his books without any CC filters (he does add 1 1/3stop,however). I don't deny that it goes a little green; however, I'vealways been able to overcome that by adding some time (I add 1/2 stopfor 8 seconds; and 1 stop for 16 seconds). Back to the original question, I guess Porta 160 (NC or VC) is areasonable choice given your situation and desire to use a colornegative film. I still think Velvia or ProviaF are better choices.To bad Kodak discontinued Ektar 25... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayne_crider3 Posted May 9, 2001 Share Posted May 9, 2001 Ah yes; The problem of 4x5 color neg film. I ran into it, but never have had anything give me what I want. Now I use a 6x9 back giving me a decently large neg and more choices. In 4x5 I'd go Provia F or Astia @200. Too bad Gold 100 isn't available in 4x5 or 120 for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdc Posted May 13, 2001 Share Posted May 13, 2001 <i>J D C, I'm suprised that you haven't used Velvia for long exposures:</i><p> I have but not of sunsets. I took 20 ready/quick loads to the northwest last fall. I was very disappointed. In all honesty though I did not test the film before hand (I shot it at 50iso) I used it mostly in the dense forests of Washington and at night in Portland. I got much better results from 100sw and 100vs (also untested and shot as rated). 20 sheets, if you bracket, might cover 6 or 7 different setups, I think I shot 5 or 6 -- so I am in no position to judge the film.<p> My comment above was overstated and I apologize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now