scott squire nonfiction Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Okay, I just got a new (used) 16-35 2.8L (and I'm quite chuffed about it, as our English friends say). I note that the focus ring allows travel (and 'focus') past the infinnity mark. Real infinity (or at least a hillside five miles away) is in focus just when the indicator says infinity, but the ring will travel further, and the focus changes too. Looks clear that it was designed to do this, but Why? Thanks, Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashtonsmith Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 I'm pretty sure that lets you focus on infinity with infra-red film. That or maybe heat/cold tolerances. I'm almost positive on the infra-red thing though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppyDigs Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 To allow focus with various sensitivities of infrared films. That is, infrared achieves focus differently than visible light. Sometimes the light’s all shining on me. Other times I can barely see. - Robert Hunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnlund Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 The user guide notes that it's to account for temerature. Did you get a guide with your lens? At any rate, the <a href="http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html#infinitymark">photonotes FAQ</a> contains a lot of useful information like this.<br/> <br/> Compensating for IR works goes in the other direction, doesn't it? That's what the manual makes it look like anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry thirsty Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 I always figured it was so the autofocus motor could overshoot without hitting a "hard stop" and possibly damaging itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sumo_kun Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 I have a 28-135 IS and that lets you twist the focus ring past either focus limit, but the focus doesn't change. Isn't that to allow for the full time manual feature? It feels like theres some sort of clutch system to decouple the motor from the ring... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_roaldi1 Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 I have an old Takumar 400mm screw-mount lens that does the same. It overshoots at both distance extremes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zax Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 The lense seems to past the infinity mark for heating tolerances. The red dot below the metering scale, which is a little bit right of the right focus sign is for infra-red fotography... Just look at the manual and everything is there.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott squire nonfiction Posted March 30, 2004 Author Share Posted March 30, 2004 Manual Schmanual! Who needs manufacturers' literature when you got photo.net? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnlund Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 <i>"Who needs manufacturers' literature when you got photo.net?"</i><br/><br/>Well, some of the answers you got were well intentioned, but wrong. PN is nice, but you can save yourself a lot of lurking time by skimming the manuals. It's worth at least flipping though the manual if only to know what's there for future reference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_gonzalez Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 I'd go with the thermal expansion explanation. Reason - My modern EOS plastic construction lenses all will go past marked infinity. My old manual Minolta lenses, all made with solid metal barrels, stop rock solid at their marked infinities. A lot more thermal expansion with polycarbonates than brass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byron_w Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 Polycarbonates will simply flex more as they warm up, so thermal expansion is hard to control. However there is not "a lot more thermal expansion is polycarbonates than in brass" It is difficult and costly to make a lens. The tolerances are very fine. In your manufacturing plant, you want to eliminate as many of these fine tolerances as possible, in order to allow cheaper "high tolerance" machining. Stopping your lens element exactly at the infinity mark counts as a high tolerance machining, and because its not strictly nessisary, the manufacturer adds a buffer(your past infinity focusing distance), and uses cheaper machining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mormegil Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Well a guy I know who has a giant Russian made reflex lens, that focuses passed infinity told me it's used for astrophotography. He was into that, so maybe he's right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akajohndoe Posted March 31, 2004 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Would it not also allow one to approach infinty focus more closely with an extension tube? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitmstr Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 to reach the "Twilight Zone"? ;-P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarl_rise1 Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 On all my old manual focus Pentax lenses the physical stop corresponded to infinity, on my newer AF Pentax and EOS lenses you can focus "past infinity".No matter the reason for this, it's a pain in the neck when doing night photos, it's to dark to see if the focus is correct, and you need a small flashlight to see the focus ring... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now