hendy_assan Posted March 4, 2004 Share Posted March 4, 2004 I am looking forward to buy a used Pentax 645N for myMF set up. Currently I have 2 offers to consider withthe same body of Pentax 645N but with different lensset up. The first come with FA 45mmf2.8 and FA150mmf2.8. The second se come with FA 45-85mmf4.5 andFA 80-160mmf4.5 lens. All lenses are autofocus and theprice different is not that much, probably around USD300 more for the zoom set up. Is it worth to buy thezoom set or the fix focal lens? I realise that thezoom will be more heavy and bulky but my readingsuggest that the quality of pictures of the zoom areas good as prime. Is it true especially for mediumformat? I also love the convenient of not changinglens and my shooting mostly consist of landscape. Fortelephoto I'll stick with my Nikon set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audun_sjoeseth1 Posted March 4, 2004 Share Posted March 4, 2004 I think you'll miss somthing between 45mm and 150mm. I you go for the set with zooms, you can sell one of the zooms if you don't like it and buy two second hand primes instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
audun_sjoeseth1 Posted March 4, 2004 Share Posted March 4, 2004 If you go for the set with zooms..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_popp1 Posted March 4, 2004 Share Posted March 4, 2004 If you can swing it, you might want to cosider the 45-85 along with the 150/2.8. This is the exact setup that I have. The 45-85 is generally thought to be just as good or better optically than the primes, and I would have to agree. Having the zoom ability in this focal length range really allows you to do a nice job of framing landscapes. And I can't say enough about the 150/2.8. Most of my favorite shots are taken with this lens. If this makes any sense at all, the 150/2.8 is simply a joy to own and use. People, pets, isolation landscapes. Everything looks good through the viewfinder with this lens. I've heard the 80-160 is a good lens optically, but I was warned to start weight-training if I was going to buy it. I haven't regretted buying the 150/2.8 for a minute, and you probably won't either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william_yu Posted March 4, 2004 Share Posted March 4, 2004 If money is not your main issue, AND if you are picky about image quality in a big print beyond 11x14, then go for the prime set. The prime set is not complete yet, you will need to get the 80 mm and the 120 mm range as well, which means eventually more money. Because your main subject is landscape, then you can afford more time to set up, and prime lense on a tripod will give you a better quality image, not only from slightly higher resolution, but also from much less distortion and much more natural perspective. If you are shooting mostly people which require you to shoot quickly, then zooms. I myself opted for a Contax 645 with 5 prime lenses. William Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_weimann1 Posted March 4, 2004 Share Posted March 4, 2004 I opted for the zooms and currently use the 33-55, 45-85, 80-160 and the 150-300. They are all outstanding in quality and versatility as you can see here: http://home.fotocommunity.de/weimann/ The Neuseeland folder and a lot of the Europa folder is taken with the Pentax equipment. Hope this helps Greetings Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now