kenneth_rowin Posted February 15, 2004 Share Posted February 15, 2004 After 9/11 the authorities were prohibiting photography on and around many of NYC bridges including bridges such as the Brooklyn Bridge that have pedestrian walkways. A number of people have posted their bad experiences in the past. Does anyone know whether this prohibition is still in effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_henderson Posted February 16, 2004 Share Posted February 16, 2004 I can't tell uou whether local laws ahve changed. I can tell you that I photographed undisturbed on and round Brooklyn and Manhattan Bridges in late 2002 and spring last year. Neither did I see any notices. I didn't use a tripod , wishing to remain inconspicuous. On the street can be a different matter. NYC is full of security guards who think they have the right (and in some cases the solemn duty) to prevent "their" buildings being photographed. I carry a copy of Bert Krages' "the photographers right" downloaded from here. Also be careful in places like Battery Park/City where the combination of park wardens and security people tend to react quickly and negatively to any tripods. Photographing in cities extensively, I'm finding more and more that it pays to be prepared , through the equipment you take and the fil choices you make, to be prepared to shoot hand-held. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrishikesh_keshavan Posted February 16, 2004 Share Posted February 16, 2004 I extensively photographed Brroklyn bridge and the Manhattan bridge last december without anybody stopping me. I did use tripod and did not have any problems with it. So I guess it should be fine now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolpahof leikonblad Posted February 16, 2004 Share Posted February 16, 2004 After September 11, the police and the security people have been overloaded with works. They are, understandably, nervous when they see us take photos of bridges and public buildings. So I guess it's good for us to be more considerate and try harder to avoid taking pictures, especially close-ups of those subjects. As for those famous landmarks like Brooklyn Bridge, I think it is okay to take picture of it. It's because there are already so many photos of it in the public domain, it seems no one cares if some more are taken. Anyway, perhaps it is still a good idea to avoid taking close-ups. As for my own experience, I had no big problems with the security people, except with a "good samaritan". Last summer, I went out to the seaside to take some photos of the beautiful partly cloudy sky with my small digital point-and-shoot camera. An old fellow about 75 years old tried to stop me. I explained to him that I just wanted to photograph the clouds for my digital darkroom and I pointed out to him that the bridge (the span of it is about 1 mile away!) was not my subject. He insisted that I should stop but I ignored him anyway. It was quite an unhappy experience. Since September 11, some people in New York City become less tolerative. Attached is a photo taken recently of a minivan with a sticker of "FREE TO OFFEND". With people of mentality like this in the city, the hobby of taking photos is now less enjoyable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolpahof leikonblad Posted February 16, 2004 Share Posted February 16, 2004 Closeup of "FREE TO OFFEND" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now