kamol_. Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Blur, Blur and Blur all Blur............:-) it's blur because i forget to fucus ;-) Are you have some blur picture ?? and Are You dizzy with my blur picture...........:-)<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamol_. Posted November 18, 2003 Author Share Posted November 18, 2003 oooop :-) Focus not fucus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott squire nonfiction Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0311/colburn.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnmarkpainter Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Damn.....and I just sold my Lomo jmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamol_. Posted November 18, 2003 Author Share Posted November 18, 2003 I swear, I'm not fake ;-) it blur with my careless..............:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry_freeman1 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 In Photoshop > Unsharp Mask > Set the Amount to 2700, Radius to 95, and Theshold to 500...jf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_chan5 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Kamol, I think you've gone a little overboard with the Bokeh stuff... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry_ting2 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Really Kamol, you bought a "state of the art" lens and is hooked the blur ?My Kodak disposable can do better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg_smith4 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 - -<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pns digicam Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 <IMG SRC= http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1903932&size=lg><BR> One of my photos <A HREF= "http://www.photo.net/photodb/edit-presentation?presentation_id=227033" >From The Passenger Seat</A> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pns digicam Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Oops... here's the proper link to my presentation <A HREF= http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=227033> "From The Passenger Seat"</A> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pns digicam Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 One more time, in the unlikely event that anyone still cares: My presentation <A HREF= "http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=227961"> "From The Passenger Seat"</A> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_Es Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Kamol, this is really over the top. Blurs have to have their own rational for being blurs. Check out the work of Ernest Haas. But I'm glad you posted this. There are some interesting pictures in this thread. PnS Digicam's "passenger" shots are a definate inspiration. Meanwhile here is a blur shot. I used either my Bessa T 101 with Pentax 43/1.9 or my Leica M6 TTL with 'cron 50/2. This is Nice, December, 2002.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pns digicam Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Thanks for the kind remarks Alex! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d._p.1 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 kamol this is embarrassing. These people were patiently posing, waiting for ages for you to get finally ready with the buttons and handles on your m6 and the rings on your ASPH instead of just doing ZAP with a digi p&s, and all you come up with is THIS... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnmarkpainter Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Ok....I have one.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d._p.1 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 no photoshop, just panning the camera. Blur in the right place i'd say.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d._p.1 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 grgrgr<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george_conboy1 Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Blur<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asher Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Hi Kamol<P> You're obviously having fun with your camera, which is great, but....<P> Like others have said, you have not used selective focus to advantage here. I've been intrigued with some local student photos that were very creative. One in particular, used selective focus to throw the foreground out of focus and have the background in focus. Ordinarily that would yield a visually unpleasing result, but what made this photo work was that there was (a) considerable distance between the foreground object and background object and (b) there was no subject matter between the foreground and background- i.e. a void. This added a very nice dimensional effect to the photo. I've been on the lookout for similar situations to try it out myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pompu Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 Kamol,<br><br>I don't think there is anything such as 'too much'. You try it if you like it. <br><br>I think most people here (or any other photography related board in the world) are so used to the conventional qualities of a photograph that they can't accept different styles. <br><br>For those who need reference on intentional blurring without selective focusing, look for the following names: Hiroshi Sugimoto (Architecture series), Uta Barth (Interiors), and Bill Armstrong.They are people who are well respected and use intentional blurring every now and then.<br><br>Keep it up. At least you are trying something different unlike most other people in the world. And one more thing. Only becasue you own a Leica doesn't mean you have to take sharp pictures all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack_lo_..._t_o Posted November 18, 2003 Share Posted November 18, 2003 I'm actually surprised at all the prescriptive comments here, the "shoulds" and "shouldn'ts". Some blurred images work, for whatever reason. They either have a dreamlike quality or they indicate motion, sometimes a fearful quality. Jordi V. Pou, an M6 user has one of a big truck on a US highway in the rain. Not only blurred but off-level. It's a very effective image. I think Kamol's image works on the "silly" level. Maybe he gave it to the couple, framed, and they had a good laugh! Here's one from last month that I like a lot.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamol_. Posted November 19, 2003 Author Share Posted November 19, 2003 Yeah............... Thanks for Jointly Best Regard.....;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougmiles Posted November 19, 2003 Share Posted November 19, 2003 Ooops...<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougmiles Posted November 19, 2003 Share Posted November 19, 2003 <div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now