noscreenname Posted August 14, 2003 Share Posted August 14, 2003 Within the range of manual focus Nikkors use, I observe that the focussing rings are considerably differently dampened. Whereas the 35mm f/1.4 is firmly dampened to a degree that the focus position does not change easily even if you keep touching the focussing ring, the 50mm f/1.4 is far less dampened, with the effect that I find it difficult sometimes to keep the focus adjusted during framing (particularly with portrait work). My preference really is with firmer damping. Now, I wonder as to whether I'm the only human being in this wide world thinking about this subject, and, more importantly, as to whether anybody knows if there are means of changing the damping characteristics of a manual focus Nikkors. I'd be happy if I could get my often used 50mm to the damping level of my even more used 35mm. Great appreciation for any response in advance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_h._hartman Posted August 14, 2003 Share Posted August 14, 2003 It sounds like it needs a little bit of grease added. I have a 50/1.8 AI that needed grease. It took three daubs about the size of a grain of millet to stiffen it up. I did this at a friend�s repair shop. It�s pretty easy job and shouldn�t cost much. Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg M Posted August 14, 2003 Share Posted August 14, 2003 It is known that AI lenses introduced in 1977 have a stiffer feel to the focus ring, where AIS lenses, introduced in approx. 1982-83 all have both an easier ring to turn and the distance from minimum focus distance to infinity was much shorter, so it's a trade-off. I like the longer focus throw of AI lenses but you have to deal with a slightly stiffer movement, where the AIS is very smooth, but the shorter distance of movement from infinity to close focus is, in many cases, too small to be able to effectively use the DOF scale on the lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobias_mennle Posted August 14, 2003 Share Posted August 14, 2003 In my experience damping characteristics depend on grease and mechanical adjustment. It can be changed by customer service. Many older lenses are less dampened because grease evaporates. I just got back my AIS 20/2.8, new grease and adjustment - it´s just perfect now, firm but smooth. Expensive though, about 100 Euro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_hoffman Posted August 14, 2003 Share Posted August 14, 2003 Age is a big factor, as the grease is slowly pushed out over many "twists". Initially, the damping is affected greatly by the tolerance between the helicord parts, and the engagement area. The largest maker of damping greases is Nye Corp, and they sell the stuff in various grades, depending on how much damping you want. The stuff is a wide temperature range synthetic grease loaded with, I think, ultra fine silica, and the design of it is quite sophisticated. In theory, you can get any lens to feel just the way you want it, but as a practical matter I suspect companies settle on one grease for most everything, often not a true damping grease at all. You'll probably learn more than I can offer by doing a search on Nyogel or Kilopoise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted August 15, 2003 Share Posted August 15, 2003 Some techs offer customized focus damping to suit a photographer's preferences or needs for certain environmental conditions. For example, less damping may be appropriate in extremely cold climates where helicoid grease tends to stiffen. My 50/2 Nikkor has very light damping and can be focusing with just the tip of my left index finger, yet the feel is positive, not twitchy. I've considered having my other lenses modified to match. Or I might do it myself. I've rebuilt Canon FD, Zuiko and other lenses. Not terribly difficult, just tedious. Judging from exploded parts diagrams for typical AI/AIS Nikkors it appears the entire inside lifts out as an intact unit which would greatly simplify this task, if I'm reading the diagrams correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noscreenname Posted September 10, 2003 Author Share Posted September 10, 2003 Thank you very much indeed for your thoughts on this, I appreciate. Looks much like a good technician could help me to get desired damping. Isn't it great that the weirdest of questions relating to photography can be and are discussed in this forum? Thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now