don_minton Posted May 19, 1998 Share Posted May 19, 1998 I am toying with buying a Bronica SQ-B, probably used, for a variety of reasons. I like the flexibility a system camera has over my Yashicamat 124G - mainly the availability of lenses, and closer focusing. (And I can now afford it!) <p> However, when you release the shutter, it sounds like you're slamming a car door! <p> I shoot almost exclusively handheld, natural light, (albiet on fast film - tri-x 320). At what shutter speeds do I need to worry about vibration? Is this a Bronica thing or an SLR thing? -- should I be looking at Hassleblads? <p> Then there is the issue of conspicuity. The yashicamat is virtually silent. I know it doesn't matter in the studio, but do you find this annoying/distracting/embarrassing in public? <p> I hope these aren't silly questions, but it is an 10x increase in equipment investment for me! If & when. <p> Thanks, <p> Don Minton www.geocities.com/soho/studios/6051 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonymous___ Posted May 20, 1998 Share Posted May 20, 1998 I experienced both : I have once tried my friend's 10-years old SQ , the shutter was smooth as silk, pleasingly quiet. But, the ETR of myself is exactly as you described - slamming the door ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eugene_crumpler Posted May 20, 1998 Share Posted May 20, 1998 Go listen to a Pentax 67. Mirror lockup is a must-have with MF SLR cameras. Ansel Adams said that he could not reliably hand hold his Hassey at less than 1/250. Even hand holding at 1/250 with the p67, I can see a difference in sharpness from tripod(Big Bogen) mounted, mirror-up, cable released 16x20's. If I want quiet, I will use C33(TLR). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim_brown Posted May 21, 1998 Share Posted May 21, 1998 What you experienced is to some extent a part of all those Rube Goldberg machines we call SLR's. In MF the mirrors are bigger and clunkier. That's why there are still many serious rangefinders in MF while in 35mm there's P&S and Leica. You could take the path less (or previously) traveled and get a Mamiya TLR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_nichols Posted January 18, 1999 Share Posted January 18, 1999 I have both a YashicaMat and an ETRS and have used a Pentax 6x7. i don't think you will ever get close to the quiet shutter of the Yashica. I only use a very light tripod and get absolutely stunning images with it at 15th second or so. The ETRS goes kappow every time, but strangely I have never seen shake. Just because it makes a lot of noise doesn't mean the images will be blurred. The 6x7 though is a different kettle of fish thanks to the focal plane shutter. On a light tripod it nearly fell over! The moral? Keep your YashicaMat for heavens sake. Invest in an ETRS or SQA (you won't regret it) but make sure you use a good tripod and cable release. <p> Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_heal Posted January 18, 1999 Share Posted January 18, 1999 <p>And yes, do go try a Hasselblad 500CM. It is nowhere near as quiet as the Yashicamat. It does have a mirror that needs to get out of the way in a hurry, but it is quite smooth. Perhaps like more like a car door shut gently (but we may not be talking about the same car :-) ). Is it quieter than the SQ-B? I don't know, but perhaps a local dealer will let you try each side by side. Best to try out the alternatives before you put down your money.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tapas_maiti2 Posted January 19, 1999 Share Posted January 19, 1999 Hi all <p> I did an interesting (if basic) experiment on vibration at home. I hired a Bronica SQA to compare vibrations against my blad and P67 and an old Canon AE1. To do this I used Kitchen scales, these are very sensitive and you can gauge how much the shutter firing distorts the scales quite easily. <p> Results. <p> The blad was much smoother that the bronica, with the mirror up it generated no more vibration the Canon. The mechanical actuation of the bronica shutter generates a lot of shake. <p> With the Pentax I also wanted to see the relative effects of the different stages of the shutter firing - I guess that if the vibration is caused by the recoil of the mirror it doesn't really matter. 1. No mirror lock up 0 much more vibration than the others. 2. Mirror lock up, fire shutter. Mirror rising causes less vibration than it returning. 3. Mirror lock up, wait for vibrations to settle, fire shutter on bulb and hold to see action of shutter. Shutter seems to cause no more vibration than the bronica. <p> Overall, I was relatively impressed with the P67, the mirror action is worse but I think the shutter vibration is overated. I was very impressed with the blad , the smoothness of the action more that anything helps to nullify vibrations and with the mirror locked up vibrations are effectively a non issue. With the bronica (the one I used anyway) I think that if it had an instant return mirror everyone would be complaining in the same way as the do over the P67. <p> Tapas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now