paul hart Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 Just had my first results back with this film - impressed so far - any others tried it?<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_lehuray1 Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 ...yes, Neopan 1600 is a wonderful film. Here is a shot rated at 6400.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furcafe Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 Yes, it's my favorite high-speed film. <center><img src="http://not.contaxg.com/files/0017/3162414crop_.jpg"></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricks Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 Nice shots all of them. Personally I only tried it once, and I did get a few keepers (from a Mexican/Dutch wedding) that are being printed at Chrome in G'town as we're speaking. Chris, are you going to the Feria De Sevilla on Sunday (if I remeber correctly)? Cheers, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas k. Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 Christopher: what ISO setting and developer did you use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricks Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 Chris, just spoke to one of the organizer, the big festival has been cancelled. There will be a smaller one in MD, contact me offline if you want the details. Cheers, p. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furcafe Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 Patrick, thanks for the info; I'll email you re: the Feria. Douglas, I shot that roll @ 1600 & had it developed commercially (they say they use Ilfotec). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christoph_frick1 Posted May 16, 2003 Share Posted May 16, 2003 Yes, I tried it, exposing it at 1250, in artificial light, had it developed by a commercial lab [don't know which developer they are using]. Quite sharp for such a high speed film, grain still OK, and giving good contrast and tonality. As an alternative, I also tried Ilford Delta 3200, exposed at 1600, in similar light, developed by the same commercial lab, but was much less happy with the results: much softer, coarser grain, much too flat contrast [i guess this commercial lab is not performing the optimal development for this film]. So I'll stick with Neopan 1600 for now, at least as long I don't do my own development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_franc Posted May 17, 2003 Share Posted May 17, 2003 It is the film I use the most. I use it at ASA 800 and develop it in T-MAX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skeeter Posted May 17, 2003 Share Posted May 17, 2003 great shot, steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_stockdale2 Posted May 18, 2003 Share Posted May 18, 2003 Christoph, This has been said a million times here, but at the risk of being very again boring i'll chime in. Do your own film developing. 99 times out of 100 you'll do it *much* better than a lab, especially with a film that they probably don't see very often like neopan1600. You need very little equipment and once the film is in the tank you can do it anywhere at room temperature (usually). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now