Jump to content

Flowers II, Summilux & 1600 ISO Neopan


pcg

Recommended Posts

i have had mixed results with neopan, but i like it better than tri-x pushed to 1600. above is a shot in a dark restaurant, with afternoon light coming in from a window 2 meters to the left. everyone was wearing black which didn't help with shadow detail.<div>0055Yl-12689384.jpg.82d04afc032f38adaac1b403e7f424df.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say that I prefer Tri-x @ 1600 over Neopan at the same ASA. Neopan is slightly tighter in the grain but its 0 lattitude (as can be seen in the image posted above) means that it lacks shadow detail and can be trickier than slide in high contrast situations.

 

I prefer Tri-x @ 1600, rodinal 1:50, 18.5 mins, 20c. YMMV

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...