scott_killian1 Posted May 7, 2003 Share Posted May 7, 2003 I'm wondering how those of you who make 20x24 prints mount them for framing. I own a Seal dry mount press which can handle up to 16x20 and I know that many people don't like dry mounting, but it seems like larger prints like 20x24 would sag with corner mounts. How are those of you who mount prints that large doing it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_baggett Posted May 7, 2003 Share Posted May 7, 2003 I use PMA adhesive from 3M. Comes in rolls 20in wide and I get mine from Light-Impressions (http://www.lightimpressionsdirect.com). It's not archival (because it's not reversable) but it is "conservation" i.e., doesn't contain acids and other bad stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_a._smith1 Posted May 7, 2003 Share Posted May 7, 2003 When I started making 18x22 contact prints I bought a larger dry-mount press. The Masterpiece 500, I think Seal called it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael gordon httpwww Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 I mount with 'standard' t-hinge technique and loosely place archival mounting corners on the bottom corners of the print. I use all archival materials. It's very climate/condition dependent, but I get very little to no 'waviness' from my prints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicholas_f._jones Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 So, far I've printed this size only on RC paper (Kodak Polycontrast III RC--my test sheet paper), then mount on foam board with Seal ColorMount mounting tissue. The tissue comes in a 24 inch 150 foot roll (obtainable at B&H). This size requires two passes on my Seal 210M press. We're very pleased with the results, but we'll be trying out fiber paper soon--but still on foam board since the cost of matting, acrylic, frame, etc. is prohibitive at this size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_becia Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 Scott, I use PMA also and it actually comes in 24 inch rolls also. While mounting this size is not recommended by Scotch, I mount my 24X30 photos with it. You just have to handle the photos carefully. I did a rather impromptu test with it last year. I mounted many photos for my art fair circuit. The photos would spend the summer in and out of my van in 90 degree plus weather. When fall came, I unloaded them in to my garage with the idea of taking them in to my basement. Well, that never happed. The mounted photos spent the winter in the garage (not heated) and the temps got down to -25 degrees once in a while. Never did get them to the basement and this spring I was a bit apprehensive about what might have happened to the mounting. Everything was perfect, so I like the fact that this PMA can stand up to extreme temperature changes. I have been using it for three years and think it's the easiest "non-expensive" way to mount photgraphs. I get mine through United out of New York and it runs about $1.30 per linear foot (24 inch roll), I think. I like this method for my work. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_mcblane Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 I dry mount my 20x24s with Seal Colormount and a drymount press on archival fomecore and use archival matts. If you have a smaller press you just make more than one pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_cook1 Posted May 8, 2003 Share Posted May 8, 2003 In as much as a large Seal dry mount press now sells for a little more than a Volkswagen, we have turned to 3M spray photo adhesive: http://www.3m.com/us/mfg_industrial/adhesives/framing/html/scotch6094.jhtml An alternative for fiber prints, including murals, is wet mounting. I can write a short (but snappy) essay on the technique for anyone who's truly interested. (e-mail me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg_pratt1 Posted May 17, 2003 Share Posted May 17, 2003 One problem of note (out of many) I experienced when mounting in the studio resulted in a lost print and more than a few suplimentary phrases. Hot evening, large print, about 2024 or so. Nicely mounted using rub on membrane. In the morning after a very cold night I found unremovable contraction ridges on the print. It seems contraction may be a factor to be aware of. I think of the print as well as the membrane which inadvertantly gets streached as the backing is pealed away. Heat pressing avoids this situatiuon. Otherwise I have been happy with the rub on technique. 2/- worth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glanton Posted May 17, 2003 Share Posted May 17, 2003 Curious, does making multilple passes on a smaller dry mount press cause lines on the photo at the junction point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now