samstevens Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 Photo of the Week is a member-run feature.The photo is posted anonymously. If photographers wish, they may identify themselves in a comment.This is not my photo.Comment on and discuss the photo or any aspect of it in whatever way you choose.If you wish to submit a photo, please PM me with either an embedded photo or a link to one. Include a title if you want one to appear. It will go into the pool and eventually be posted as a Photo of the Week. * * * 5 "You talkin' to me?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Melia Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 successful example of looking at something a different way and making the viewer look at something differently ... (to paraphrase Jay Maisel) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
je ne regrette rien Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 (edited) I have the feeling, as if I was looking at the yeti. A large brown nose among thick fur to hide in the snow and ice. Edited September 19, 2022 by je ne regrette rien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricochetrider Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 (edited) Interesting and quite curious at the same time! No earthly idea what we’re seeing but it’s a fun photo. Edit: looking closely there’s more color than first meets the eye Edited September 19, 2022 by Ricochetrider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
httpwww.photo.netbarry Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 It's different but doesn't do anything for me. Not because I don't have an identifiable subject, I enjoy abstract art, but because it looks like it's basically a photoshop action. Look forward to see what the artist has to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 Doesn't work for me in any way. It looks like a slowish exposure of a sudden mass of water falling (but not a waterfall per se), with the sun making very intense highlights on the spray. It interesting in the sense of I want to know what it is, but as a photo to me it is a miss. Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin Barkdoll Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 I really like the animalistic and dynamic quality of this photo. Makes me think of a giant beast that is staring pointedly at me. The only very minor thing I would change is to crop the "eye" off center a bit, perhaps up and to left. Test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn McCreery Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 I think that the photo is of water cascading down and over a rock, with the shutter speed chosen to provide suitable streak lines for individual drops (perhaps illuminated by flash from the top?). I really like the photo. The pattern of black negative spaces and the rock, which looks to me like a rodent peering out from within the water flow, really helps create an interesting composition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Reid Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 Many thanks to all who commented! First, I can assure you that no pixels were harmed in the processing of this image—It’s pretty much how it came out of the camera (though I did slightly modify one anomalously straight line by cloning a few light trails into a gap), with modified contrast and clarity. Robin and Glenn were on the right track in figuring out how it was made: I used a relatively long shutter speed so that bright bubbles would form light trails. We’re looking almost straight down on a pebble in the backwash of a wave. The light trails are formed by individual bubbles in the foam, and the occasional vibrant colors are from the iridescence that some bubbles show. The strong illumination is from the rising sun. I’d had an idea of the image I wanted to make, but it took a week of experimenting (there aren’t a lot of fogless sunrises here) to figure out how to actually accomplish it, since the sun angle had to be as low as I could get it for the illumination to work out (bubbles light, sand dark), and it doesn’t stay that low for long. I used a compromise shutter speed of 1/10 sec—I would have liked it to be longer, but this is the limit of what I could hand-hold. Actually, it’s slightly beyond the limit—I had a lot of blurred images at this speed. I was curious about how strong the pareidolia effect might be with this image. I’d first thought about rotating the image 90 degrees (which was how it was exposed) to help defeat it, but I decided I liked the vertical light trails more. The answer is in: Pareidolia strikes deep. Here’s the image in the original orientation: And here’s the image with Edwin’s suggestion of a modified crop: Any opinions on the alternatives? BTW, I realize I never id’d myself on my prior POTW; the open door with the hidden tennis shoe was also mine—#38: Photo of the Week - #38 6/6/22 Now I’m going to be humming Buffalo Springfield all day. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 I think if it had been shown in the "right" orientation, then more of us would have understood the image a bit better. I was wondering how a burst of water like that could have fallen vertically just when you were ready to photograph it. Now you explain it it makes it easier to comprehend. I think it is an interesting image, but it doesn't ultimately appeal to me, but I am just one person so what do I know. Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanford Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 I thought that was a sea otter! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn McCreery Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 I like the composition as originally presented the best, since I am attracted to the pattern of black negative spaces as much as the streak lines. Sanford - It's not surprising that someone who lives in Monterey sees a sea otters in the photo. Someone who lives in North Dakota might see a prairie dog. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Melia Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 I thought that was a sea otter! me too. makes two of us. got her outvoted! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samstevens Posted September 24, 2022 Author Share Posted September 24, 2022 The combined sense of movement, abstraction, and nature grab me. It’s one I can look at and get lost in, not leading me to clarify. As an aside, I like the pre-crop spaciousness and scale as well as the pre-rotated up and down energy. 1 "You talkin' to me?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickeysimpson Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 Many thanks to all who commented! First, I can assure you that no pixels were harmed in the processing of this image—It’s pretty much how it came out of the camera (though I did slightly modify one anomalously straight line by cloning a few light trails into a gap), with modified contrast and clarity. Robin and Glenn were on the right track in figuring out how it was made: I used a relatively long shutter speed so that bright bubbles would form light trails. Now I’m going to be humming Buffalo Springfield all day. Well done Leslie! A defined goal combined with perseverance and skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin Barkdoll Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 I prefer the cropped, vertical version - more powerful to me, almost muscular. Test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Reid Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 I thought that was a sea otter! me too. makes two of us. got her outvoted! It does indeed look like I’m out-voted, and I can even see the whiskers. I'm thinking of entitling it “Odder,” since it’s an odder otter than it ought to be. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samstevens Posted September 25, 2022 Author Share Posted September 25, 2022 It does indeed look like I’m out-voted, and I can even see the whiskers. I'm thinking of entitling it “Odder,” since it’s an odder otter than it ought to be. I think you … oughtta. "You talkin' to me?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Reid Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 I think you … oughtta I may need to concede on the word-play, too, because after this I'm utterly outta other "otter" ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
httpwww.photo.netbarry Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 Thanks forth background Leslie. I'm glad no pixels suffered :). It's interesting how the image anthromorphises the rock into lo0oking like a nose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
httpwww.photo.netbarry Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 Sort of reminds me of Minor White and his mystical approach of using his photos to transform then objective world into abstractions. In short, the rock looks like nose :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now