rodeo_joe1 Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 We had the gender naming discussion at TG dinner as one of the guests' daughter had gone trans and is now a "they" or a "them". One thing I would say is that other people didn't create the new pronoun's trans people use. These folks chose the name for themselves. Personally I think it's a clumsy locution for a pronoun, but it's their choice on what they want to be called. I know the language gets a little tortured, but think of it as if someone insisted on calling you a girl in conversation, you might not like it. As I said, I fully accept the existence of three genders, which includes neutrality. It's the other two dozen genders that I'm informed have been invented that I take issue with. Yes. And the word awful once meant inspiring wonder. Language, and culture, evolve. That’s hard for some people, welcome by others. I would expect no other response from the passive-aggressive and self-righteous 'liberal'. To clarify: Yes, I'm irked by the devaluation of words such as "awesome" and "enormity"; it removes expressions of events beyond words from the language. I'm also dismayed that there appears to now be an entire generation that can't string together a short sentence without inserting the word "like" between every other word. Dismayed, but not apoplectic about the above. However, I take task with the description "evolve". Devolution would surely be a far better descriptor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samstevens Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 I would expect no other response from the passive-aggressive and self-righteous 'liberal'. Speaking of devolution, look how quickly we went from “I’m losing my freedom of speech” to using that freedom for name calling. sticks + stones "You talkin' to me?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanKlein Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 Getting back to the OP question about consent. I think once you ask, it becomes more portraiture rather than street which should have a more extemporaneous feel about it. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanKlein Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 It should also have feelings from or among the people in the shot. Otherwise, it's more of a snapshot recording the passage of time. There should be something that makes you smile, or cry, or emote something. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samstevens Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 I think once you ask, it becomes more portraiture rather than street If this is your experience, it's valid and likely has to do with the way you ask and the resulting shot you choose to take. It's not, however, the experience of every street photographer, many of whom ask for permission and come up with very compelling street photos that would likely not be seen as portraiture. There are many ways to ask permission. One can quickly gesture to someone on the street who may simply nod back agreement but not adopt a pose for the photo and just continue what they were doing. And no rulebook exists that says that a posed shot can't be street photography. Then there's the example I gave above of asking a group of guys playing basketball in the schoolyard if it's ok to take pictures while they go about their game, candidly. And then there's not asking permission and being waved off just a little too late! don't shoot me "You talkin' to me?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanKlein Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 Well, at least he didn't have his finger on the trigger. ;) Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 Why do I see in Sam's photos a gay guy, dressed up as a girl, showing their rear end? Why do I see a photo of a half naked bloke? And then we have a guy in a uniform how nice. I see little in these photos to do with street photography, other than set up photographs of titillating sexuality. "The 1 out of 100 of yours that might not, though put in the context of your body of work, I wouldn't necessarily think you innocent of sexualizing her as you do the other young women you photograph" Sam Pot calling the kettle black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 I know many photographers who do ask permission and they get great results. With me, I think most people can tell I am taking or about to take their photo, so it is not a surprise if I decide to do so. They are free to object, but not all that many do. In the past, occasionally, people would put their hand up to cover their face, but nowadays with the ubiquity of cell phones I find this happens less often. I have asked permission on a few cases when it would be just too awkward to not do so. All this is rather moot at present as due to Covid I have not been street shooting for about 2 years. Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samstevens Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 All this is rather moot at present as due to Covid I have not been street shooting for about 2 years. I've been doing a lot of empty street shooting. :) "You talkin' to me?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Twitter announced that there must be explicit consent from everyone appearing in a posted photograph. Forget holiday photographs of crowded streets, and possible those taken from the space station ;) I used Twitter once. I think it was in 2013. I think its best use is to assemble a flash mob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
httpwww.photo.netbarry Posted December 10, 2021 Share Posted December 10, 2021 I know this thread is pretty much left for dead, but I remembered this photo I thought kinda applies to the article the OP linked too From a play area installation at LACMA Los Angeles 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now