Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Important:
please keep your image under 1000 pixels on the longest side for in-line viewing, and
please keep the FILE SIZE UNDER 300kb
. Note that
this includes photos hosted off-site
(at Flickr, Photobucket, your own site, etc). Are you
new to this thread?
The general guidelines for these Wednesday threads are
:
. This forum's moderators are allowing up to three Nikon Wednesday images per week, so share some work!

 

It was a busy week, so you know what that means: Wayback Wednesday! Today, my thrown photo dart landed in 2007, where I was observing ancient Rome's solution to violent street activity. Also good for chatting up the tourists in Verona. Feel free to go folder diving, or share whatever's fresh! This one would have been with a D200 and a 17-55/2.8.

 

centurions.thumb.jpg.7781b92e7a24360e86dd54ad57359aa0.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)

DSC_6193.thumb.jpg.e19c0c27af44ae39461b4a35fbfbcfde.jpg

D810 + 50mm f/1.8 Ai

 

While I'm here, may I make a suggestion? There would be no need for the rather restrictive 1,000-pixel, 300 KB limit guidelines if people would insert their images "as thumbnails" using the provided option in the user interface. That way, cake can be had and eaten too, as only the lightweight thumbnail is loaded with this page, while anyone who wants to view an image at higher resolution need only click the thumbnail.

Edited by chulster
  • Like 5
Posted
I always thought it was to protect a usefully hi-res image from being 'borrowed'.....

 

I think not. The guidelines make no mention of any concern for users' IP rights; they only talk about saving users' bandwidth and reducing the time it takes to load this page over a slow connection.

 

If the mods (@Matt Laur) are serious about this, however, they should change the guidelines to simply: "insert thumbnails, not full-size images."

Posted
I think not. The guidelines make no mention of any concern for users' IP rights; they only talk about saving users' bandwidth and reducing the time it takes to load this page over a slow connection.

 

If the mods (@Matt Laur) are serious about this, however, they should change the guidelines to simply: "insert thumbnails, not full-size images."

 

I'm not a mod! I'm just a lowly peasant user, tasked with carrying the torch of this ancient, arcane tradition. I'm like the guy who feeds the groundhog in that town in Pennsylvania all year long. I don't make the rules, I just copy and paste them! If Shun wants to alter the vibe on this matter, I can copy and paste new rules just as easily.

 

All that said, yes: the notions surrounding this topic pre-date the current forum software, and were certainly hatched during an era of smaller screens, more expensive server storage, and narrower user bandwidth. Personally, I don't at all like the butchery that occurs to quality image files when they get smashed through aggressive compression to be rendered here and in similar venues. But it's the intersection between the laws of physics and some practical matters surrounding using and running such a platform.

 

Being honest, I'm flabbergasted that this recurring thread, to say nothing of this brand-specific forum, let alone this entire web site, still exists at all!

  • Like 5
Posted
Being honest, I'm flabbergasted that this recurring thread, to say nothing of this brand-specific forum, let alone this entire web site, still exists at all!

 

Thanks for tending the fire, Matt!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...