mike_haycock1 Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Hey guys, Love reading through the forum here, a lot of good stuff. My question is in regards to the 7D's High ISO performance. I'm kinda looking for comparison, I know this is a Minolta forum, to Canon and Nikon. I understand that some of the suggestions may be swayed here, but for the most part I think this is a pretty fair forum. Concert shooting is my main concern right now with ISO performance. I do have other questions, but I'll just wait for those. Thanks guys. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orensztajn Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Here you have a good link: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/konicaminolta7d/page23.asp go forward and you will see more. Rgds/ Gustavo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_lewis3 Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 here are some 7D users iso 3200 pics :) http://www.dynaxdigital.com/viewtopic.php?t=433 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattalofs Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 I put a page up on my site with some 7D shots at various ISO's: <a href="http://www.1point4photography.com/7D.php" target=_blank>http://www.1point4photography.com/7D.php</a><br><br> The only other DSLR I've used extensively is the 10D. I don't have the 10D anymore, so I can't do a direct comparison, but I think the two are pretty even. The 7D might be a bit better at 3200. <br><br> The 7D does have a few lowlight advantages that are hard to come by in other DSLRs; the anti-shake can give you a couple of extra stops and the vf is big and bright for manual focus when af fails. I've only had mine for a week, but I'm impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_haycock1 Posted October 20, 2005 Author Share Posted October 20, 2005 Thanks guys!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjmarkowitz Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 Question, with the AS feature, do you still need such high ISOs? Can't you use a lower ISO and compensate with a longer shutter time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennis_fallon1 Posted October 21, 2005 Share Posted October 21, 2005 Mike, here are a couple ISO 1600 pics taken mostly with the 135/2.8 (couple with the 17-35G) that are along the lines of concert pics (circus pics) ... http://kingofthebeasts.smugmug.com/gallery/843837 In reply to the last q re: AS ... motion blur can be effective in performance shots, but you want the option of minimizing it, too, with as-fast-as-possible shutter speeds. The 135/2.8 is a little gem for this stuff, too ... a 200mm equivalent FOV and a little lens that's smaller than the 28-75/2.8. - Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_haycock1 Posted October 21, 2005 Author Share Posted October 21, 2005 Dennis, I apperciate the anwser. Thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjmarkowitz Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Dennis, AS will not eliminate motion blur. An object moving across the lens' field of view will still appear blurred. AS will only eliminate hand shake. Therefore, my question is still valid. Can you get away with lower ISOs and longer shutter times? Or, is the fact that you may not want longer shutter times because of motion blur the reason that you want to use high ISOs? I guess the answer will depend on the shooting situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now