bleda_han Posted January 30, 2003 Share Posted January 30, 2003 hello I have recently discoverd wide angle photography, and I am quite taken by it. Although I do not yet have an extreme wide angle lens, I have the 'luxury' of choosing between a Vivitar 28mm f/2.8 on a manual Minolta x70, and my Canon EF 28-105mm 3.5-4.5 at the 28mm/f3.5 end on my Rebel G. Since landscape photography is my target for now, the extra speed of the Vivitar does not make a difference. So far I have compared them only with Royal Gold 100 and T-Max 100 (tripod shots) - to be honest I cannot decide which is better. I would greatly appreciate some input before I start burning money using slide film (first time ever) with these lenses. Thank You very much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NK Guy Posted January 30, 2003 Share Posted January 30, 2003 Uh - what exactly is your question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canon man Posted January 30, 2003 Share Posted January 30, 2003 If you have the kit 28-105, I would say it doesn't matter as both are lo dolloar lenses. If you have the 28-105 then I would say use it. My 28-105 3.5/4.5 USMII is an incredibly sharp lens for a zoom. Not as sharp as an L but way better than anything I had in my FD lineup including some Canon primes. since you have a Rebel why not hit the classifieds here. Ther is aCanon 28mm 2.8 for $95. I would love to have it but I just dropped 1000 on a 70-200 2.8 L and a 420 EX/stroboframe and offcamersa ahsoe cord. The next peice I buy need to be the 1.4X L TC. I have heard that th4e 28mm 2.8 is incredibly sharp and I may still buy it if someone else doesn't pick it up. I answered your question in ths manner assuming you were asking which will give you the best results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsriram Posted January 30, 2003 Share Posted January 30, 2003 I have not used the Vivitar 28/2.8 but I wouldn't be much off the mark in guessing that the Vivitar, being a prime, is bound to have much less distortion, better sharpness and less flare compared to the Canon zoom. I have a 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM myself, and the distortion at 28mm is very noticeable. My 28-105 needs to be stopped down to f/6.7 or at least f/5.6 for decent sharpness. Your Vivitar probably doesn't need to be stopped down so much for sharp images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleda_han Posted February 1, 2003 Author Share Posted February 1, 2003 Hi and thanks for the responses Here, and elsewhere the Vivitar lens has got positive reviews. It seems to be a better idea to shoot slide film with the manual Minolta - Vivitar 28mm combination, rather than the Rebel G - EF zoom. Ciao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now