Jump to content

EF zoom @28mm end or manual Vivitar 28mm 2.8 (Minolta body)?


bleda_han

Recommended Posts

hello

I have recently discoverd wide angle photography, and I am quite

taken by it.

 

Although I do not yet have an extreme wide angle lens, I have

the 'luxury' of choosing between a Vivitar 28mm f/2.8 on a manual

Minolta x70, and my Canon EF 28-105mm 3.5-4.5 at the 28mm/f3.5 end on

my Rebel G. Since landscape photography is my target for now, the

extra speed of the Vivitar does not make a difference.

 

So far I have compared them only with Royal Gold 100 and T-Max 100

(tripod shots) - to be honest I cannot decide which is better.

 

I would greatly appreciate some input before I start burning money

using slide film (first time ever) with these lenses.

 

Thank You very much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the kit 28-105, I would say it doesn't matter as both are lo dolloar lenses. If you have the 28-105 then I would say use it. My 28-105 3.5/4.5 USMII is an incredibly sharp lens for a zoom. Not as sharp as an L but way better than anything I had in my FD lineup including some Canon primes. since you have a Rebel why not hit the classifieds here. Ther is aCanon 28mm 2.8 for $95. I would love to have it but I just dropped 1000 on a 70-200 2.8 L and a 420 EX/stroboframe and offcamersa ahsoe cord. The next peice I buy need to be the 1.4X L TC. I have heard that th4e 28mm 2.8 is incredibly sharp and I may still buy it if someone else doesn't pick it up. I answered your question in ths manner assuming you were asking which will give you the best results.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not used the Vivitar 28/2.8 but I wouldn't be much off the mark in guessing that the Vivitar, being a prime, is bound to have much less distortion, better sharpness and less flare compared to the Canon zoom. I have a 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM myself, and the distortion at 28mm is very noticeable. My 28-105 needs to be stopped down to f/6.7 or at least f/5.6 for decent sharpness. Your Vivitar probably doesn't need to be stopped down so much for sharp images.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...