Bill C1664885404 Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 <p><strong>A lot of rain here the past couple days…but birds have to eat so I put out the morning sunflower seeds, birdseed, mealworms, and peanut butter as usual. And when this Red Bellied Woodpecker showed up, he was understandably soaking wet.</strong><br> <strong> </strong><br> <strong>Canon FDn 200 / 2.8 @ 2.8, NEX-7, ISO200</strong></p> <p><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v630/roundball/PHOTOGRAPHY/BIRDS/WOODPECKERS/RED-BELLIED/122414WetRedBellyWP200mm28-1B1CCrop1Amt_0Hue_-1Sat_zps7e773378.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="653" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_Es Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 <p>That is really a fantastic shot!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill C1664885404 Posted December 26, 2014 Author Share Posted December 26, 2014 <p>Doesn't matter if Canon FDn lenses were made 30-40 years ago...they still get it done, eh...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwmcbroom Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 <p>I owned one of these lenses back in the 80s -- the second version with IF. I found it to be an exceptionally good lens for some uses. For others, it was a big disappointment. I got severe CA -- color fringing in green and magenta when shooting bright, high-contrast subjects. But if things were more muted at all, it worked wonderfully. For example:</p> <p>Canon F-1, FDn 200mm f/2.8 IF, Kodachrome 64<br> <img src="http://michaelmcbroom.com/images/asr_riversidepp.jpg" alt="" width="1000" height="667" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill C1664885404 Posted January 1, 2015 Author Share Posted January 1, 2015 <p>"...<em><strong>the second version with IF................for others, it was a big disappointment</strong></em>..."</p> <p>I was not all that impressed with my IF version either...rarely used it and after getting an FDn 80-200/4.0-L, I never used it so I eventually sold off the 200-IF, original box and all.</p> <p>Since then I came across my 1st Generation FDn 200/2.8 at a good price and having just sold off a couple other things decided to get it and am glad I did...so far, it seems to be a very good lens.<br> <br />And not being into fast action shooting, I don't miss the short focusing throw of the IF model...indeed, I believe I get more precise focusing with the slower Helicoid mechanism in the 1st Generation...its identical to the Helicoid focusing mechanism used in the FDn 50/100/200 Macro lenses which yield precise focusing.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfcole Posted January 2, 2015 Share Posted January 2, 2015 <p>The woodpecker shot has lots of purple fringing.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ant_nio_marques Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 <p>Bill C takes awesome pictures.<br> Where do birds go when it rains?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill C1664885404 Posted January 11, 2015 Author Share Posted January 11, 2015 <p>".....Where do birds go when it rains?....."</p> <p>They got it pretty tough I guess...I suppose the best they can do is get up under some thick vegetation.<br />I've added a piece of tin on top of the roof of a couple bird feeder so there's a few extra inches of overhang all the way around to keep rain from blowing in on the birdseed...and sometimes I notice small birds lined up camping out under the overhang when it's raining</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now