richard_downey Posted December 28, 2002 Share Posted December 28, 2002 I would appreciate information and advice on paper negative photography in a 4x5 camera. Can 4x5 paper be slipped into a negative carrier? If so, can it be inserted in less than total darkness? What type of paper? And processing .. any particular chemicals? Any input would be welcome. I rather like the idea of a paper negative, not having a fully equipped dark-room, and the intention of never doing more than contact printing when using film. By the way, thanks for come-backs on other issues. Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_downey Posted December 28, 2002 Author Share Posted December 28, 2002 oops! I mean't into a sheet film holder. Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ole_tjugen Posted December 28, 2002 Share Posted December 28, 2002 Why - of course! It may be difficult (at least it is in Norway) to get 4x5" paper, but 10x15cm can easily be cut down to size (that's 4x6", or close enough). Use any single-weight paper, do all work in safelight - red or amber or some such. Graded paper is better than multigrade, which has some surprising (well - they shouldn't have been...) contrast differences depending on the colour of your subject. Photographic paper can be considered to be blue-sensitive only, so you'll get the washed-out skies of early photography. Developed in paper developer (like Neutol), I have used a ISO 3° as a starter sensitivity. Some papers are faster; few are above ISO 9°. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim_atherton2 Posted December 28, 2002 Share Posted December 28, 2002 there have been long discussions on this before - check out the archives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil_poulsen1 Posted December 28, 2002 Share Posted December 28, 2002 I tried this recently, and got decent results. It's a neat process that gives a unique appearance to the final print. My process was to print a negative at whatever contrast appeared best for the given photograph. Then, I contact printed this positive against another sheet of paper to obtain the paper negative. My final step was to contact this paper negative with yet a third sheet of paper to obtain the final positive. As for tips, the paper negative tends to exaggerate contrast. So, I generated this negative at a grade 1 contrast using the older style Ilford 6" contrast filters. Then, I printed the final print from the paper negative at grade 2 contrast. I used Agfa Classic F VC FB paper. Given your filters and/or paper, you may need to experiment a little. I have a Patterson foam rubber contract printer which works well for contact printing negatives. But, it did not work well for paper negatives. While I didn't try it, I thought that it might be worth using one of the old-style contact printer, like those made by Premier. (There's currently one up for auction on EBay.) I suspect it requires a fair amount of pressure to between two sheets of paper to get good results. If you are really serious about this approach, there's a decent reference. I can't find my copy, so I can't recite the publisher and author. But, the title is something like "The Making of Paper Negatives". I found mine as a used book in a local bookstore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr5 examples Posted December 29, 2002 Share Posted December 29, 2002 If you really want to get into paper negs, there is a book called "primitive photography". It tells you how to make your own cameras, lenses, film holders (for wet and dry processes), and paper emulsions. The author's idea was to be able to do photography even if (when?) manufacturer's stop making products for photography. It's a good book, but it takes some dedication to try out his approach! Isaac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_kennedy Posted December 29, 2002 Share Posted December 29, 2002 I second the recommendation. Great book. Shows you how to do everything! Even make your own lenses! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_ingram Posted December 29, 2002 Share Posted December 29, 2002 You may or may not know this, but this month's issue of Black and White Photography Magazine (the British one) has an article on paper negs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_sutherland Posted December 29, 2002 Share Posted December 29, 2002 Just curious, what kind of effect do you get from negative paper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_downey Posted December 29, 2002 Author Share Posted December 29, 2002 Thanks everyone. I picked up my Sunday paper at Border's today. While there I ordered a copy of Primative Photography and managed to find a copy of B&W Photography, Brit. edition, December issue. Page 63 photo of Will, Grannie, and Alice is wonderful. What a timeless photograph. Good examples of the results of paper negatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_hunt1 Posted December 29, 2002 Share Posted December 29, 2002 Richard If you go to my slim portfolio in the gallery on photo.net I've got a photo self portrait taken with a paper neg. Some details are there - Ilford MG4 exposed at ISO 3 - about 1sec at f/16. Don't forget to print the neg face down, otherwise the light goes through the paper fibres after going through the image - not good! p.s. I just realised I could upload the image here - so, hopefully, here it is.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_downey Posted December 29, 2002 Author Share Posted December 29, 2002 Very well done, Joe. Your cottage windows seem to be European in design, and I think I detect a bubble cable release. Regards, Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally_hess Posted December 31, 2002 Share Posted December 31, 2002 I never would have thought of using paper as a negative until I read this post. ThanksI played with it today using Kodak RC paper cut down to 4"x5". Print was exposed at F11 for 90 seconds using existing room light.Rather than reprint onto paper, I scanned the paper negative into photoshop, added the brown tint and cropped image. Image is attached.I'll admit its not a great artwork, but I will have fun playing with this technique over the new year holiday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_downey Posted December 31, 2002 Author Share Posted December 31, 2002 Good shot, Wally. And, congratulations on keeping your kitty-cat still enough for a ninety second exposure. I would suggest obtaining a copy of the Brit edition of B&W Photography, December issue, for some tech info and fine paper negative illustrations. Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tacocharly Posted December 27, 2003 Share Posted December 27, 2003 well, this is about a year late, but i was shooting lots of paper negatives well before this thread was started, wuth an 8 by 10 camera i borrowed. i just scanned and uploaded them to the web a few days ago and was doing some research for an upcoming project with paper negatives. if its any help to anyone in the future, you can take a look at these, shot mostly on ilford miltigrade rc, or kodak polycontrast rc. http://ethan.sadmensclub.com/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=8x10granddaddy,ofpaperplates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now