Jump to content

One body, one lens, one film


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1) SL, 400mm f/6.8, K64<BR>

I used this combination almost exclusively for 6 months in the

everglades. I also had a 90mm Summicron-R, Nikon FTn,

55mm Micro-Nikkor, and 300mm f/4.5 Nikkor. I used the 90

occasionally, and one roll of film in the Nikon.

<P>

2) I can't imagine the type of photography I like without the

400mm f/6.8 Telyt. If I didn't have the Leicaflex SL I'd have

chucked photography long ago. However, I might be content with

a Contax 645 & 300mm f/4 APO-Tele Tessar+2x extender, with

Provia 100F.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm. I don't own a Leica anymore but I'm torn between two possible choices:

<br><br>

1) Rollei 35S w Sonnar 40/2.8 and Delta 100 <br>

2) Hasselblad 903SWC w Biogon 38/4.5 and Delta 400 <br>

<br>

Of course, the reality is that I'll probably shoot 95% of 2003's photos with my Sony DSC-F707, which has a Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 9.7-48.5mm f/2-2.4 lens (38-190mm 35 format equivalent) and adjustable sensitivity from ISO 100-400.

<br><br>

Godfrey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...