john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>thanks Dan. Still, for anyone wants to spend the time I'll put up a few more shots for each lens with better subject matter (all converted from RAW with no postprocessing). </p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>Canon 55-250mm @ 60mm, f5.0, 1/250, ISO 1600</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>(for previous post)</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>Canon 55-250mm @ 179mm, f5.7, 1.250, ISO 1250</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>Canon 55-250mm @ 208mm, f5.6, 1/250, ISO 800</p> <p> </p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>Tamron 17-50mm @ 29mm, f5.0, 1/250, ISO 400</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>Tamron 17-50mm @ 19mm, f5.0, 1/250, ISO 400</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>Tamron 17-50mm @ 47mm, f5.0, 1/250, ISO100</p> <div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_lee48 Posted August 14, 2012 Author Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>should mention that one reason I'm considering calibration is that the camera body has suffered some impact shock. <br> http://www.photo.net/alternative-cameras-forum/00ZTHG<br> <br />The filter and lens took most of the force, though. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g dan mitchell Posted August 14, 2012 Share Posted August 14, 2012 <p>John, again, it is really not helpful to link so many photographs into your post. It begins to appear more than a bit obsessive and I, for one, am not going to be interested in downloading and inspecting what must now be several dozen sample photographs.</p> <p>I'll suggest again, that if really feel that you need to share this many images you could post them on your Flickr or other account, put them on the web somewhere, join PN and post them here, and so forth. The place a single image here with a single link to the place where others can go through the entire gallery.</p> <p>If I may be so bold, there are likely two reasons you are getting so little response to your post. First, the bulk posting seems obsessive. Second, it really doesn't seem like you have a real problem with your gear.</p> <p>I hope you will consider the advice I shared back on the previous page about getting on with your photographs and not worrying about this non-issue.</p> <p>Dan</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_bessler Posted August 15, 2012 Share Posted August 15, 2012 <p>Time to lock this post,going nowhere...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now