jitendra_katre Posted August 3, 2011 Share Posted August 3, 2011 <p>how often do you use tripod for bird photography?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stp Posted August 3, 2011 Share Posted August 3, 2011 <p>Nearly all the time.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randallfarhy Posted August 3, 2011 Share Posted August 3, 2011 <p>Rarely, without a gimbal style head I find it too limiting and cumbersome for in flight work. I opt for a monopod instead. While not as stable, it offers a decent compromise in that it's much lighter and far more maneuverable. Eventually I will purchase a gimbal head for the more static work, an area that a tripod will excel in.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_dannenbaum Posted August 3, 2011 Share Posted August 3, 2011 <p>Occassionally, usually when shooting a static subject location, like a nest or feeding site. Then it comes in real handy. I can set up my equipment faiirly close to my anticipated subject, then move away and shoot with a remote trigger. </p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathangardner Posted August 3, 2011 Share Posted August 3, 2011 <p>whenever possible</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcstep Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 <p>Nearly never. I found that my bird in flight keeper ratio went through the roof when I started hand holding almost everything. This is a 7D, with a 500mm, a 1.4x TC hand held at 1/1600-sec:</p> <p><a title="Duck...no... osprey. by dcstep, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6137/5991668637_53fc3dc702_z.jpg" alt="Duck...no... osprey." width="640" height="427" /></a><br> Hand held also:<br> <a title="Rufous hummingbird (female) sizes up a wildflower by dcstep, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6013/5986110228_6b0a4c6892_z.jpg" alt="Rufous hummingbird (female) sizes up a wildflower" width="640" height="640" /></a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philip_wilson Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 <p>I don't shoot birds a lot and I like the in flight. Since I don't use hides and just shoot them when I see them I tend to find handheld is best. In a hide or for static birds a tripod would be a big help.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keith reeder Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 <p>Never.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbkissel Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 <p>I find it tough to use a tripod when not shooting from a blind. And I'm rarely in a blind, so I mostly handhold shots. I will use a monopod on occasion.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_j2 Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 <p>I prefer to handhold and that's the way I shot almost all the time until "age & Arthur crept up on me" and I lost a great deal of strength and range of motion in my arms.<br />So now I am pretty much forced to use a tripod and ballhead. (Would prefer a Gimball but have to settle for the ballhead.)<br />I shoot both birds in flight as well as Aviation Air shows, so yes, the tripod is cumbersome at times, but as of lately, has become my best friend.<br />I can't say my "keeper rate" is any better or worse.<br />Best wishes,<br />Jim j.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_washburn Posted August 4, 2011 Share Posted August 4, 2011 <p>As you can see from the responses so far, it depends. The advisability of using a tripod increases as your strength ebbs for whatever reason, as your lens and camera weights increase, as the light fades, and as you concentrate more on static rather than in-flight photos...and in this context "static" includes situations where you can predict the positioning of moving birds: as they approach or hover around a feeder or a pool of water, for example. A gimbal head will greatly increase your comfort level for static shots by allowing you to quickly pivot over a wider range; how much it helps for in-flight shots is highly debatable.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linda_jones1 Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 <p>Rarely use a tripod, unless I know the action will be in one spot which requires long camera holding periods. I'm a girl and hand hold the 500mmf4IS. I bring a small travel stool with to sit and rest the camera on my legs when waiting for action.<br> I also have more keepers and quickness while hand holding. The thing is, carrying 12 lbs. of gear PLUS a gimbal head and tripod just adds more weight to lug. So it's only reasonable when you are going to one spot or two and staying put. But if you like to hunt for action all that gear is a real pia! ;) I got to the point that it was easier to carry nothing but bare lens on the camera. I can throw a monopod at my waist belt and use it if there is low light or long waits going on.<br> A different story though if you don't have IS.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaeljlawson Posted August 7, 2011 Share Posted August 7, 2011 <p>Since I don't own a decent tripod, never. If I could afford a good tripod and gimbal head I would certainly give them a shot though.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jitendra_katre Posted August 7, 2011 Author Share Posted August 7, 2011 <p>thanks everybody for really useful feedback....</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now