david_hall6 Posted November 9, 2002 Share Posted November 9, 2002 I am doing some contact printing on Agfa FB VC paper (although I wish I had the old Insignia or Portriga) while I wait for my Azo to arrive. I am using Neutol WA, and I have two questions for those who use it: 1) What is your standard dilution, and do you dilute differently for contact printing versus enlarging? 2) How much can you dilute the stuff (or strengthen it) to control contrast before it starts to get mushy? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_perkins Posted November 10, 2002 Share Posted November 10, 2002 David I have used this under similar circumstances to yours, so my comments are not based on year in and year out use. A dilution of 1:10 works good. Two minutes or 3 times the time it takes for the image to start to appear, to vary on your experience. No difference whether contact printing versus enlarging, as the reaction of the chemicals on the paper is the same. I don't think you would get contrast control from the developer within standard dilutions of 1:10 to 1:15, although I have done that with full strength dektol for half the time, and you could try it. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoffrey_james Posted November 10, 2002 Share Posted November 10, 2002 I read somewhere, and it has been proven by experience, that with Agfa classic and Neutol WA, it is important not to let the temperature of the developer go under 68. It is better at 70. For contact prints, I use one-to-7 and, if necessary, a water bath. BTW, I find Forte warmtone paper far better for contact prints. It is about half the speed, thus allowing you to throw a little light on the subject, has a very heavy stock, and absorbs selenium like crazy.I stopped using AZO when the range of available grades shrunk dramatically. It is also a pain to order. In Toronto, there is a Forte supplier. Never like Insignia -- used it for a few years and found it differed wildly from batch to batch. The earlier Record Rapid was a much nicer paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now