ronen_ashkenazi Posted December 15, 1997 Share Posted December 15, 1997 I am looking for opinions on the YashicaMat 124G tele kit and wide kit. Specificaly how is the optical quality as compared to the 80mm lens alone. <p> Thanks, Ronen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_v._nelson Posted December 17, 1997 Share Posted December 17, 1997 Most auxillary telephoto and wide angle adapters, regardless of maker are pretty awful. Thats why Rollie went to tele and wide angle cameras. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_loynd Posted December 18, 1997 Share Posted December 18, 1997 I have used the wide & tele adapters. Used at 5.6 they both give "acceptable" results (at least on 5x5 pints). At f8 or f11 they start to vignet in the corners. The more you stop down the darker the corners. It's not like having wide angle and telephoto lenses, but when you have no choice. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
don_minton Posted July 12, 1998 Share Posted July 12, 1998 I tried the Wide Kit. didn't like it. Didn't inhale. <p> To me, the trade-offs were too great: Its only _slightly_ wider,; you loose at least 1 stop. Vignetting and sharpness in the corners is a problem, esp now that you are shooting a stop or more wider. Focusing image is much dimmer. <p> I shoot "street" and found these trade-offs unacceptible. May be ok for some people, esp. in a studio setting. I am currently considering a C-220 w/ a 65 for wide-angle protability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now