The demise of a D3 with 24-70 2.8 lens

[phule]

<p>How about a D700 and 400 f/2.8 meeting a 200 MPH drag racer:<br>

(hint, it does not end well)<br>

http://markjrebilas.com/blog/?p=10225</p>

 

[Kent Shafer]

<p>Rob, great link—thanks.</p>

[dave_wilson1]

<p>So that's what they mean by "exploded view"..... 8-)</p>

[AndyMiller]

<p>I think you find "sympathy" in the dictionary between "sh*t" and "s*philis" - has your insurance now asked you to mark out all your assignments by flying a red flag and signed up as "Hard Hat" areas?</p>

[pantelis_katapadis]

<p>CHECK THIS OUT, another thriller: <a href="http://markjrebilas.com/blog/?p=10225">http://markjrebilas.com/blog/?p=10225</a> , D700 and 400mm KIA :), Here is another Grand find, It looks like Nikon doesnt need to publish camera blueprints any more , now we know what the insides of a D700 look like :)</p>

[phule]

<p>It's almost as if I had just seen that link somewhere...</p>

<p>:P</p>

[tom_mann1]

<p>It must be deja vu all over again.</p>

<p>;-)</p>

<p> </p>

[andrew_fedon]

<p>Ehh, Panteli, don't you read the previous posts before posting...LOL...? :) Nase kala file !</p>

[Sanford]

<p>If it had been one of the plastic mount Nikon lenses the camera might have survived.</p>