tamara_fosher Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 <p>I've recently seen a friends wedding photo's in an online gallery. I LOVE the technique the photographer has used on some of her pictures. I am shooting 2 weddings in a few months, and would love to know what kind of action they may be using or how they are getting this effect. Thanks in advance!!<br> <a href="http://harperpoint.smugmug.com/Weddings/Kelly-and-Todds-Wedding/13202478_UR4C4#958647544_DjcnS">http://harperpoint.smugmug.com/Weddings/Kelly-and-Todds-Wedding/13202478_UR4C4#958647544_DjcnS</a> (k-t-357)<br> <a href="http://harperpoint.smugmug.com/Weddings/Kelly-and-Todds-Wedding/13202478_UR4C4#958639199_K7XHs">http://harperpoint.smugmug.com/Weddings/Kelly-and-Todds-Wedding/13202478_UR4C4#958639199_K7XHs</a> (k-t-333)<br> <a href="http://harperpoint.smugmug.com/Weddings/Kelly-and-Todds-Wedding/13202478_UR4C4#958634315_GrcMz">http://harperpoint.smugmug.com/Weddings/Kelly-and-Todds-Wedding/13202478_UR4C4#958634315_GrcMz</a> (k-t-316)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daverhaas Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 <p>Looks to be a combination of over saturation and "high key" - purposefully blowing out highlights and whites...</p> <p>there may also be some fading or desaturization on some images - to give that 60's feel.</p> <p>Dave</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_krouskop Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 <p>What I see in these photos are lots of flash, purposely overexposing the image and dragging the exposure back in post. The action or preset looks like one of the Totally Rad products. I have been working on shooting a little brighter myself. I using mostly prime lenses, exposing for the face and using high speed sync with my speedlights outside. I have purchased the Totally Rad presets for Lightroom and they are amazing. I rarely go to Photoshop. This look is very popular right now and perfecting it will, in my opinion, increase sales.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_h.1 Posted September 15, 2010 Share Posted September 15, 2010 <p>I wonder what percentage of people asking all these 'How did the photographer do this' questions and supplying links to the photographer, make any attempt to ask the photographer?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redphoto Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <p>It looks like they used an on camera flash to supplement the lighting on their image. They are using it at or above the ambient light exposure to give a little harder, more contrasty look to the image. Then I think the contrast and saturation has been punched up a little in PS or LR. There are loads of plug ins, free and paid, that can do these kinds of things. But you don't need any plug ins, you can just play around in PS until you find similar effects. Look on line for tutorials that cover 'high contrast fashion look' or 'contrast boost'. Experiment and come up with your own look. It takes some time and practice.<br> <b>Signature URL removed. Not allowed per photo.net Terms of Use.</b></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acbeddoe Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <p>I suspect this type of image is a passing fad. A whole wedding album done this way would be very tiresome and quickly become dated.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_t5 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <p>what i see is that they used totally rad's actions :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoochs pics Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <p>In response to John,<br> Most photographers don't give out this information. I'm sure alot of people have tried. I wouldn't give out this information. It basically my trade secret. I'm sure Pepsi doesn't ask Coke for their formula.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
picturesque Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <p>Photographers have given out processing information--we had an instance last year, prompted by a thread just like this one. It doesn't hurt to ask.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_t5 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <p>just go to totallyrad's site and they have a page dedicated to recipes...there are some there that look like the ones you listed and they tell you which actions they used.</p> <p>and to chong, it is my impression that great photographers tell their postprocessing techniques if you ask them.. but there are a lot of "average run of the mill" photographers that don't like to tell... and more often these are also the ones that complain how newcomers are ruining their business. :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_h.1 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 <blockquote> <p>I'm sure Pepsi doesn't ask Coke for their formula.</p> </blockquote> <p>Photographers frequently talk about techniques including here on photo.net. Many have tutorials. I wouldn't equate asking a question that might get an answer to a futile effort to uncover Coca Cola's intellectual property secrets.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savagesax Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 It's interesting that you like the blown out look. This really isn't something new, so you could do some searches and see a lot of photographers doing this. The technique is to over expose while you are shooting, sometimes having the people facing the sun, using a flash on every shot, and knowledge of using photoshop. I think it's ok to do a lot of these shots at weddings, but you may also wish to focus on the bread and butter shots; the photos that always seem to sell. Such as bridal portraits, family shots, and so on. Perhaps people may disagree with me and of course I would expect that to happen. From what you wrote are the upcoming weddings your first ones or have you been shooting for awhile? If these are your first weddings do some searches here just to make sure you are aware of what to expect. For example having the bride and groom, along with the parents, give you a list of must have shots. If you do these must have shots you've made everyone happy. For example some on the guests may have come from long distances, often overseas, mom's best friends, things like that. Most photographers hate lists and many don't bother with them. I don't like the lists either, but I feel we are hired to do a great job and often a list is needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markonestudios Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Tamara, remember not to overdo the effect, else it could fast become cliche and frankly, boring. On a handful of shots, ok, but on a whole bunch of them is a no-no IMO. Also, try emailing the photographer. What's the worst that can happen? :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kristyberends Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 <p>Maybe this is obvious to most people, but probably not everyone. The biggest effect going on here is the use of a wide angles lens. There is definitely some post processing as well, but if you have never seen a wide angle used in portraiture, its very cool. Maybe I am missing the exact nature of the question, but that is what jumps out at me. Here is a post from my site where you can see both wide angle t 16mm and my normal work with a 50mm (5d mk2 - full frame camera)--www.kristyberendsphotography.com/2010/09/alyssa-and-kyle-wedding-grand-rapids</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now