Troll Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 <p>40mm Summicron and 90mm Tele-Elmar.<br> The AF-C1 offers an excellent combnation of f:2.8/40mm and a built-in 2X tele extender giving f:5.6/80mm.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apostolos_tournas Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 <p>For traveling, I suggest Elmarit 21/2.8 ASPH and Elmar 50/2.8 collapsible. <br> Due to RF's long baseline, focusing with a super wide angle is much more accurate that with a SLR lens of the same focal length. The Elmarit 21mm is extremely sharp, sharp enough to allow blow-ups of landscape scenes, but what makes it extraordinary is its tolerance in edge distortion, even at close range shots.<br> As for the Elmar, apart from its versatility being 50mm, light and unobtrusive, it is practically distortion-free. No other 50mm is of that low in dostortion.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray_dicecca Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 <p>5cm Summitar f/2 on my IIIf and 35 Summicron (v4) on my M6.</p> <p>Bill, I still have my AF-C1 also. Cute little shooter. I need to take it out more often.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason_inskeep Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 <p>24 2.8 and 50 1.4.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis_g Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 <p>Elmarit 21/2.8 ASPH and a current 35 Summicron.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astral Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 <p>Summicron 28mm f2 Asph and 75mm f2 Asph. . . . Now who's paying?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fate_faith_change_chains Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 <p> Why not the 28/35/50 mm tri-elmar with the 16/18/21 mm tri-elmar, or either one of those with a fast 50.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aplumpton Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 <p>A 35mm f2 ASPH, probably Leica's finest lens to date, and after that it is not too important, a toss up betwen the 12mm VC or the 90mm Elmarit-M, depending upon the type of photography that day. With the M8, the superb 75 mm Summicron would be great as a second lens, with my 21mm F2.8 ASPH as the other, however the budget won't allow a third aspherical lens.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g-man1 Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 28mm summicron asph. 90mm summicron asph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_neuthaler Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 <p>28mm ElmaritM 1:2.8; 21mm Super Angulon M 1:4</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_neuthaler Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 <p>28mm ElmaritM 1:2.8; 21mm Super Angulon M 1:4</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david finch Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 <p>A 50 and a 35. A have a couple of LTM Leicas and use the 50/3.5 Elmar and 35 Summaron. For Contax IIIa I use the 50/1.5 Sonnar and the 35 Biogon. The Biogon is a particularly good lens.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_stack Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 <p>Only two? Pretty easy, have to agree with 28 and 50. To add a wrinkle, if ONLY one lens for all time, really easy. 40mm, my favorite and most suitable lens, for most situations that I'm interested in photographing.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett_callow Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 <p>35mm Elmar and 50mm f3,5 Elmar, both uncoated. Don't forget to bring the hoods!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karim Ghantous Posted August 18, 2010 Author Share Posted August 18, 2010 <p>John R.: 28mm & 50mm? Interesting. Sounds about right for a RF camera. I'm almost tempted...<br> <br />I see that some go 28 & 90. I worry about the gap in the middle - but then again, going a bit more extreme eliminates any notion of vagueness!<br> <br />Stuart, I'd like the 75/1.4 but it's a big lens. I chose the 75/2.5 for its relative compactness. But, oh boy, I want the 75 'lux!<br> <br />I note that Guido chose 35 & 50. Too close together? And for those who chose 50 & 75 or 90 - you obviously don't shoot in crowded rooms! :-P<br> <br />Brett: very interesting camera, that Fuji. Must look into it.</p> <p>Patrick: only one lens? That's tough. Very tough. For tradition I'd go 50mm. But no matter what I chose I'd <em>always</em> be wondering if I made the right decision!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gadge Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 <p>Hey Paul....you are only allowed one go ;-)</p> <p>My fantasy take is 35mm F2 Summicron Asph and 75mm F2 Summicron<br> In real life though it's a VC Ultron 35 f1.7 and an F4 Elmar-C</p> <p>Is that two goes?</p> <p>Gadge</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james mitchell dc Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 <p>If it's limited to lenses I own: 28 'cron and 50 'lux ASPH.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_dimarzio Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 <p>David Finch is correct on the 28mm Biogon for Contax RF mount. An great lens!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken_ford1 Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 <p>My current 35 Cron ASPH plus a 75 Cron ASPH. It'll never happen - I have to be happy with my C-V 75 and 90 Elmar-C.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_quiogue Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 <p>1. a 35mm canon f1.5 (m39) for wide and low light, and<br> 2. 90mm thin tele-elmarit<br> Both are great for travel!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctorbabaguy Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 <p>Hasselblad X-PAN with 45mm and 90mm</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gadge Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 <p>Reply on behalf of Leica.....<br> 40mm F2 Summicron and 90mm Elmar-C<br> That is the choice that they actually made when faced with the same dilemma and the Leica CL.<br> My guess is that they would have selected a 35mm Summicron if making the same decision for a film M camera at that time. Today I suspect that a F2 28mm and 75mm lens combo may well be their choice for a film M two lens combo.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakley Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 I was going to say 28/2 ASPH and 50/1.4 ASPH until I realized that John gave the right answer: <p> <i>My progressive lenses that I'm wearing</i> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzdavid Posted August 22, 2010 Share Posted August 22, 2010 <p>2.8/24 Elmarit ASPH -- it's a beauty. Plus 50 Summicron, any kind, or the 35 'cron ASPH. So hard to keep it to two!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now