taschin Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 <p>I have a monitor Nec MultiSync P221W. I perform the hardware calibration with Spectraviw II and the results are good.<br> Recently, I tried the other software which can access to the internal LUT of Nec P221W: The Spectraview Profiler 4, that is a nec version of the well known basICColor Profiler 4 (I tried also this).<br> To my surprise, the results after the calibration are very bad: the banding in the gradients are terrible and the validation results are bad in the grey tones.<br> The target calibration values were D65, gamma 2.2, 120 cd/sqrm and min. native, the same which I used in Spectraview II.<br> The basiccolor company suggests me to increase the luminance of white up to 160 cd/sqrm: the result is a little bit better but nothing to do with the Spectraview II performance.<br> There is somebody which calibrates a monitor P221W with this software and with good results?<br> Is it normal this behavior?<br> Thanks<br> Andrea</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chas_frady Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 <blockquote> <p>I have a monitor Nec MultiSync P221W. I perform the hardware calibration with Spectraviw II and the results are good.</p> </blockquote> <p>I'm not understanding why you would want to change...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taschin Posted June 16, 2010 Author Share Posted June 16, 2010 <p> No , I don't want change, it was just a curiosity. Perhaps, the only weak point of spectraview II is that it make a matrix and not a LUT profile. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now