Sean Peele Back with Copyright Infringement with aglimpseofyouphotography.com

[Member69643]

<p>Until he pops up again with another site...</p>

<p>Ever see the movie "Mystery Men"? Methinks we have the same power as Ben Stiller's character.</p>

[john_h.1]

<p>The link above brings one right to the site and its up and running right now.</p>

[picturesque]

<p>John--the link doesn't work on my computer. What are you running? I have Explorer 8.</p>

[kelly_flanigan1]

<p>Nadine; here his site address works on a mac with safari; but it is just a dummy site with some godaddy adverts etc.<br>

Try hitting F5 a few times to force a brower reload with IE</p>

[StuartMoxham]

<p>I'm just getting the go daddy adverts now.</p>

[picturesque]

<p>I just got on the site again. Anyone know what is going on?</p>

[jeff_livacich]

<p>I'm just getting the GoDaddy page. Did you save a mirror of the site which your computer's bringing up? I don't know if that would happen; just a guess.</p>

[picturesque]

<p>Not that I know of, although I haven't turned off the computer or Windows at all. And I got the godaddy ads a few times too.</p>

[melissapapajphotography]

<p>What a jerk!</p>

[picturesque]

<p>I'm still able to get on his site. Anyone able to explain this?</p>

[jeff_livacich]

<p>OK, right now, 9:30 PDT, his site came up for me, too.<br /> Maybe they're kicking him off and he's putting it back up.</p>

[bobatkins]

<p>I see the site just fine. It's possible he's switching hosts and we're seeing a slow propagation of new nameserver information. It can take anything from a few minutes to 24hrs for information on new name servers to propagate across the network. While that's happening some people will see the site on a new host, some will see it on the old host depending on the routing.</p>

 

[jefflipsman]

<p>According to WhoIs <em>AGlimpseOfYouPhotography.com</em> is no longer with GoDaddy. It is now registered as shown below:</p>

<p>Registrant: BluDomain<br /> 17919 E. Dorado Drive<br /> Centennial, Colorado 80015<br /> United States<br /><br /> Registered through: Domains Priced Right<br /> Domain Name: MONSTERBLU4.COM which is hosting <em>AGlimpseOfYouPhotography.com</em><br /> Created on: 19-Mar-10<br /> Expires on: 19-Mar-11<br /> Last Updated on: 19-Mar-10<br /><br /> Administrative Contact:<br /> Hasselbach, Aundrea info@bludomain.com<br /> BluDomain<br /> 17919 E. Dorado Drive<br /> Centennial, Colorado 80015<br /> United States<br /> (303) 895-6196<br /><br /> Technical Contact:<br /> Hasselbach, Aundrea info@bludomain.com<br /> BluDomain<br /> 17919 E. Dorado Drive<br /> Centennial, Colorado 80015<br /> United States<br /> (303) 895-6196<br /><br /> Domain servers in listed order:<br /> DNS23115.DIZINC.COM<br /> DNS23116.DIZINC.COM<br /><br />Registry Status: clientDeleteProhibited<br /> Registry Status: clientRenewProhibited<br /> Registry Status: clientTransferProhibited<br /> Registry Status: clientUpdateProhibited</p>

[StuartMoxham]

<p>I see it has different pics now the Dreussi picture is back up and another Rachel Barker shot.</p>

[mark_t5]

<p>well, if its bludomain that should be easy to take down, i doubt bludomain want to alienate their core customer by helping a photo thief.</p>

[jeff_livacich]

<p>Slippery li'l sucker, ain't he?</p>

[jeff_livacich]

<p>Nadine-<br>

Several bridal/wedding sites link to the prior thread on this guy. Could that thread be updated with the latest info.?</p>

[jeff_livacich]

<p>I don't know if it's the same guy, but he seems to be the only Sean Peele in SoCal, and one of only a few in the country.<br /> Go to the last of the comments on this opinion piece.</p>

<p>http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2008/07/are-there-more.html</p>

[surfidaho]

<p>Howdy!</p>

<p>I wonder if he ever actually delivers on a contract? Is he a complete fraud, or just an image thief?</p>

<p>Enquiring minds want to know...</p>

<p>Later,</p>

<p>Paulsky</p>

[surfidaho]

<p>I'm sorry, I should have said "alleged complete fraud" and "alleged image thief". One does not wish to be sued by a scoundrel.</p>

[mariosforsos]

<p>I know a class action suit (and perhaps all other forms of legal action) may be completely outside the premises of photo.net and may indeed be extremely difficult to either initiate or organise, but has anyone thought of sending a letter signed by all those affected to various local newspapers? Personally I would even try some of the larger regional and even national newspapers - the issue is actually much, much larger than Mr Peele; it's about theft and how easy it is for thieves to get away by using the ease the internet provides in setting up on-line identities...</p>

<p>I may be wrong, but I have the feeling that there will be some journalists interested in researching this...</p>

[melissapapajphotography]

<p>Channel 4 news Utah came to my house and interviewwed me last night...</p>

[melissapapajphotography]

<p>My picture is still on his site...</p>

[longname]

<p>Jeff, that find was an absolute gem. If it's the same Sean Peele then the person obviously has a basic knowledge of copyrights and infringing upon them.</p>

[hugh_j.]

<blockquote>

<p>I'm sorry, I should have said "alleged complete fraud" and "alleged image thief". One does not wish to be sued by a scoundrel.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Contrary to popular belief, using "alleged" doesn't protect you from a libel or slander suit. Best to either refrain from using such words, or politely request the moderator to remove them.</p>