simon_t1 Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>HI,<br> Any examples of macro taken with 5D mark II please.<br> Thanks,<br> Simon.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>Why? What would you expect to see, based on a small downsized image, that would be any different from macro shots with any other camera?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon_t1 Posted April 2, 2010 Author Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>I've seen many portraits and loved them, just wish to see some macro with the 5D. I already own a 50D and intend to keep it and think I might add the 5d II with it. Its different than the 50D (sensor size etc).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon_t1 Posted April 2, 2010 Author Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>Here is an image I taken with the 50D</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliot1 Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>5D MK II with 100mm</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon_t1 Posted April 2, 2010 Author Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>Thanks very much Elliot. Nice image</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
costas_polinakis Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>with 100/2.8</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
costas_polinakis Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>another one with 100/2.8</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben_goren Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>Here’s a handheld 1:1 macro shot with the 180L on a 5DII. ISO 800, if I remember right, and the 580EXII bounced off the shower curtains. Couldn’t have gotten the shot without live view; there wasn’t anywhere near enough room between the eyepiece and the bottom of the tub to stick my head, even if I wanted to.</p> <p>Cheers,</p> <p>b&</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>I still don't see the point of the question. What do you learn from such images? What would it matter which camera they were taken with?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philip_wilson Posted April 2, 2010 Share Posted April 2, 2010 <p>I prefer my 5DII with the 100 F2.8L IS over my 7D with the same lens</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian_hutchison2 Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 <p>Not sure I understand the question, but here are a few thousand examples (not mine):<br>http://www.pixel-peeper.com/adv/?lens=none&camera=1113&perpage=12&focal_min=none&focal_max=none&aperture_min=none&aperture_max=none&iso_min=none&iso_max=none&exp_min=none&exp_max=none&res=3</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluphoto Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 <p>The only difference I see in using a 5D (or other full frame camera) is that macro "technically" is defined by the image of the subject being the same size or greater than the subject itself. With a larger sensor, you can take a photograph of a larger subject and still call it macro. Shooting the same subject with a cropped sensor would make the image smaller, which might mean it's smaller than life size.</p> <p>Not sure what all that actually means, but it's the only thing I can think of which makes the term macro vary from camera to camera.<br> I think technically any contact print is "macro" as it's a 1:1 representation of the subject.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now