dennisgg Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 <p>Processed only with Canon DPP software. I am loving it!</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennisgg Posted March 12, 2010 Author Share Posted March 12, 2010 <p>Here is the original</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppyDigs Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 <p>Yay! What are those? Industrial strength toilet bowl floats?</p> <p>DPP default NR is pretty darn good. The same RAW in ARC would be terrible (unless a NR plugin is used).</p> Sometimes the light’s all shining on me. Other times I can barely see. - Robert Hunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennisgg Posted March 12, 2010 Author Share Posted March 12, 2010 <p>Some sort of fishing floats - this is at the fishing docks of Newport, Rhode Island.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enrique_bocanegra Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 <p>I did a quick test for my 7d at ISO 6400 with ef-s 17-55 f2.8. Images are 1/15 sec@f2.8. I am amazed at how quick it focuses with very low light. Images were processed from the same RAW in DPP, Aperture 3 and lightroom 2.6 ACR 5.6. Only noise correction was applied to each at maximum. They are arranged as follows:<br> top-dpp, middle-aperture 3, bottom- lightroom 2.6. Which is better?<br> <a title="DPPcrop by angelboc, on Flickr" href=" title="DPPcrop by angelboc, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2729/4427973111_5c0af014d5_o.jpg" alt="DPPcrop" width="855" height="569" /> </a><br> <a title="aperturecrop by angelboc, on Flickr" href=" title="aperturecrop by angelboc, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2745/4428739372_e12e12ef08_o.jpg" alt="aperturecrop" width="856" height="569" /> </a><br> <a title="lightroomcrop by angelboc, on Flickr" href=" title="lightroomcrop by angelboc, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2779/4428739100_753361f53b_o.jpg" alt="lightroomcrop" width="859" height="572" /> </a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enrique_bocanegra Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 <p>Original size same order: DPP top, aperture 3 middle, lightroom 2.6 bottom.<br> <a title="DPP by angelboc, on Flickr" href=" title="DPP by angelboc, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2770/4428738968_ce03407fac_o.jpg" alt="DPP" width="1024" height="683" /> </a><br> <a title="aperture by angelboc, on Flickr" href=" title="aperture by angelboc, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2787/4428739518_eac6acc609_o.jpg" alt="aperture" width="1024" height="683" /> </a><br> <a title="lightroom by angelboc, on Flickr" href=" title="lightroom by angelboc, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4041/4428739682_3f2514ff52_o.jpg" alt="lightroom" width="1024" height="683" /> </a></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbkissel Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 <p>I find DPP works pretty darn well on 7D files. You will lose detail at higher NR settings, but it does a good job in default mode. Most of the complaints I hear are related to its editing capability. I use DPP to convert RAW images, then other software for editing/fine tuning.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakhtar Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 <p>This is 100% crop on 500D at 6400!</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now