olivier_de_lame Posted September 22, 2002 Share Posted September 22, 2002 Hi,<p> I would like to buy a wide lens. <p> I would like to know if 20mm would not be too wide for people photography. <p> Thanks, <p> Olivier. <p> <i>Moderator's Note: The question above has been edited to focus it on the very appropriate question about People Photography. The rest of the question pertained to specific lens choice and should be submitted to the General Photo.net forum. Photos that show the use of very wide angle lenses are certainly welcome.</i> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emre Posted September 22, 2002 Share Posted September 22, 2002 It's not too wide at all; the 20mm is my standard indoor lens. My <a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/1024600">last</a> <a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/1009070">two</a> pictures were taken using this lens. It is not as hard to use as some would have you believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted September 22, 2002 Share Posted September 22, 2002 A 20mm is a blast, but for people photography it must be used with care in doing anything close up due to distortion. I've used that distortion for editoral effect, but it ain't flattering unless used with great care. For wider shots that include the environment the people are in it is great. BTW, the Canon 24/1.4L is a world class lens, perhaps a used one can be found at a reasonable price with a little hunting? No zoom can optically compare to it, let alone shoot available light like it can.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edward_kang Posted September 22, 2002 Share Posted September 22, 2002 <center> <img src=http://madmilk.com/forum/20mm.jpg></center><br><br>A 20mm is an awesome lens to have, and it is eminently useful for people photography. <br>You can distort on purpose (or accident), but my favorite application is environmental portraiture.</center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henk Posted September 23, 2002 Share Posted September 23, 2002 Olivier A 20mm isnt too wide, the perspective is just harder to control. I work alot with ultra-wides, there is so much you can do with the perspective and the huge amount of background you are able to capture. Heres an experiment with an 18mm Nikkor and K1 extension ring. <center> <img border=2 src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1026706&size=lg"> </center> Greetings, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maarten_van_viegen Posted September 23, 2002 Share Posted September 23, 2002 jeanloup sieff used a 21mm on his leica for fashion-people-portrait photography. do a google search on him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulo bizarro Posted September 24, 2002 Share Posted September 24, 2002 Why not? Any lens will do, provided you take care with composition. Look at the corners to prevent any unwanted things poking into the frame. Check my children portfolio, there is a picture in there of my kids taken at 16mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_ngo1 Posted September 24, 2002 Share Posted September 24, 2002 I agree that a 20mm lens can offer a great perspective. But be careful when composing your subject near the edges of the frame because things can distort unflatteringly. I shoot a lot of candids around this focal length and I've tossed more than a few because of the dreaded "big nose" effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olivier_de_lame Posted September 29, 2002 Author Share Posted September 29, 2002 Thank you for all the answers, I will buy a 20mm lens and try it. Regards, Olivier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now