mike dixon Posted August 27, 2002 Share Posted August 27, 2002 straight photography<P> <img src="http://mikedixonphotography.com/rearview.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolf Posted August 27, 2002 Share Posted August 27, 2002 Wow! What a great photograph... It has the feeling of travelling (it's the rear view mirror in a car, isn't it?) and yet an intimate atmosphere of the two women. ... and I always love car pictures!! maybe because I don't have a driving license ;o) best wishes, Rolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
struan_gray Posted August 27, 2002 Share Posted August 27, 2002 I like this a lot, but would prefer not to have the right hand head - it makes me look for an interaction between the women, and there isn't really one. With just the left hand pair of eyes you would have more mystery and I would look for longer. It's a long shot, but if you get a chance to see Kikuchi Kawada's series "Car Maniac", jump at it. Similar ideas, but with wonderful competing external elements as well as the car interior, and in colour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henk Posted August 27, 2002 Share Posted August 27, 2002 Mike, I dont understand where you are going with this minimal focus/sharpness aproach. Maybe you can enlighten us... Are you trying to find the edge of what is visually interesting, move to a less active role in you pics(analysing signature) or just clearing the fridge of overdated film?;) Can you tell us more about this quest of yours, or is the resent OOF batch an unintended seies of events. Greetings, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaiblanke Posted August 27, 2002 Share Posted August 27, 2002 I would like to make pictures like these but unfortunately these girls do not enter my cars ... Great picture, but the dark right side is a bit disturbing even if OOF. I would also opt for a larger rear mirror. Is this the 75/1.4 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emre Posted August 27, 2002 Share Posted August 27, 2002 Just where is this approach supposed to "go"? I think this a great photograph. I disagree with Struan; I can imagine an interaction between the women. This seems like a quiet moment (note: they're both staring) after a serious remark. Also, the absence of the second person would have certain connotations. Very creative work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike dixon Posted August 27, 2002 Author Share Posted August 27, 2002 Thanks for the comments. This isn't really a carefully planned concept or a conscious attempt to "go somewhere." The photo caught my attention because the context is still readily recognizable even though everything but fragments of a couple of faces are completely blurred--the shape of the small in-focus area was sufficient to define the situation. [Lens was indeed the 75/f1.4.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl_crosby3 Posted August 29, 2002 Share Posted August 29, 2002 Artistic gabble is the refuge of those who make technically deficient photographs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted August 29, 2002 Share Posted August 29, 2002 "Technical deficiency" is specific to the purpose of the photograph. For example, a K-Mart portrait photograph should be in focus everywhere. For this photograph, there is no such requirement. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografz Posted August 30, 2002 Share Posted August 30, 2002 Mike, believe it or not, this is one of my favorite of your images. It breaks away from your usual approach and explores new ground for you ( for all I know, you do a lot of stuff like this, but we never see it ). Good stretch, a real need in order to keep growing. Thanks for having the courage to share it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike dixon Posted August 30, 2002 Author Share Posted August 30, 2002 Thanks, Marc. It really isn't new ground. About a year and a half ago, I did a related shot (below) in an all-night cafe utilizing a couple of mirrors, though I wasn't thinking about that when I took the current shot. [i've also done a number of shots using my car as a "set."]<P> I haven't been showing those kinds of shots on the net so much lately for several reasons. One of the most important reasons is that, because such work is more an expression of a personal view, other people's opinions really don't matter that much! ; ) The input I get on the more "commercial" work is more valuable to me because it helps me to understand how successfully I'm hitting a somewhat-defined target.<P> <center><img src="http://mikedixonphotography.com/mirrors01.jpg"><P> <i>small faces</i></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymond_tai Posted August 30, 2002 Share Posted August 30, 2002 Mike, I would like to see your entire series on this motif. These two photos are amont the most interesting I have seen in years. Very nice work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graphicjoe Posted September 7, 2002 Share Posted September 7, 2002 Maybe I�m missing the point or something, but I don�t get it. The photograph reminds me of what I find when winding on the first few frames and activate the shutter to advance the film. I don�t know if this setting is a car or not, but I don�t see that I matters. I don�t see a connection between the two women based on what I see of them. The large white area blocks what appears to be an important area in the picture. The lack of focus is not a concern for me; I don�t see that the photo would gain by being in focus. Sorry, but it just does not work for me.Joe Stephenson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now