What do you think of the lighting done here?

[d_g5]

<p>http://www.studiolighting.net/curvatura-issue-1-vol-1/<br>

chime in</p>

[Matt Laur]

<p>The lighting is unremarkable. The heavy-handed post production work is a far more visible part of the image's results.</p>

[d_g5]

<p>What did you think of page 24 Matt?</p>

[Matt Laur]

<p>Don't see any links to additional pages. Just one illustration-looking image, with an opportunity to zoom in and out. That's it.<br /><br />If there <em>are</em> 24 pages to go through so that someone can see what you're talking about, you need to tell people that, or provide them a link to the image you're actually looking to show them. Otherwise, there's no way to know what you're referring to.</p>

[d_g5]

<p>you can actually click the left half of the page and it'll flip the page. sorry.</p>

[bobcossar]

<p>As to Page 24: Mmmmmm....The image on the left is pleasing...a nice study really. But the lighting isn't anything special, or difficult to have achieved.</p>

<p>The image on the right is a different kettle of fish however.....the image looks quite contrived, but it's the processing that really doesn't work for me........I find myself searching the sky for the Mother Ship.........sorry, that's just how I felt about it.......Regards, Robert</p>

[nathan_meador]

<p>That first one looks more like a cartoon.</p>

[d_g5]

<p>Thanks for the feedback! Good or bad... I appreciate it!</p>