gib Posted August 25, 2002 Share Posted August 25, 2002 I did a search and didnt find the answer. I am thinking of buying a D60....it will obviously take any Canon EF lens with the dreaded 1.6x factor. What is known about Tamron and the problematic Sigma lenses. I had a Sigma 28-105 I had to get rechipped to work with my Canon Elan 7E, which the Canadian distributor did for free. I walked in and they did the job in 15 minutes, although they first had to get the correct chip from the US or Japan (took a week). I currently own the following EF lenses: 20 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 50 f1.8 mk II, 85 f1.8 Thanks and if I missed this question already answered in the forum, my apologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_p._schorsch Posted August 25, 2002 Share Posted August 25, 2002 The "dreaded" 1.6 factor can cut both ways. I am finishing a work on a Brazilian National Park and needed to get more close-ups of birds, animals and flowers. The D60 made my 200mm lens into a 640mm with a 2x teleconverter. I found it cheaper to buy a D60 than to invest in heavy glass. For macro work it's also very impressive. As far as lenses, the D60 is just like any other EOS camera in the Canon lineup for lenses. Be careful with your flash though because the D60 doesn't work with the EZ line of flashes only with the EX's. Digital is definately a different experience. It has it's pros and cons. It's nice to get instant feedback, no more laboratory bills and you can change ASA in midroll (mid-flashcard). The cons are that the it's a little less sharp than slides and you must download and burn those CD's which can be a pain. With film, after the lab, I could just forget about my film. With digital you have to do a bit more "Homework". Good luck, cheers, Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gib Posted August 26, 2002 Author Share Posted August 26, 2002 yeah, 1.6x is a great thing for everyone who wants to reach out and touch wildlife, but isnt as good for landscape photographers who want wide, wide, wide. :) Thanks for the feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_olson Posted August 28, 2002 Share Posted August 28, 2002 Scann a 35mm slide or neg at 400 dpi and cropp it to the same size as the D60 image. The resolution of the scanned image will be greater than the 6 mega pixel image of the D60. So until we have a 20+ M Pixel full size sensor we must live with compromises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pphaneuf Posted September 30, 2002 Share Posted September 30, 2002 Ignore that last comment. D60-produced images are giving medium formats like 6x4.5 a run for their money, so cropping 35mm is *definitely* not going to give better images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam_smith7 Posted September 30, 2002 Share Posted September 30, 2002 I concur. 8x10 and 8x12 enlargements I just had printed from the D60 files (on a Fuji Frontier 370) are better looking than prints this size I've had made from Reala negatives and Velvia slides. The D60 files are smaller in dimension, but their enlargements show dramatically less noise than those from film. They look much smoother, like you'd expect from 645. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now