onlooker Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 <p>What do you think are the optimal dimensions for an image printed on 13x19" paper and why? Do you know of any good discussions of this topic? Thanks.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 <p>Depends on the aspect ratio that makes the photo work.</p> Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob_sunley Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 <p>All depends on how you are displaying the print. Frameless, matted with border, without border, etc.</p> <p> To add to Jeff's comment, if it's a square image, trim off 6" of paper. :) After all it is just a factory size. If I want to print a 10x20" print, I cut 6" off the side of a piece of 16x20 paper, adjust the easel and make my print.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonybynum Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 and what's optimal? there are standard sizes. If you adhere to the standards, you will be able to optimize your financial investment because standard sizes are available to purchase, ie frames, glazing, backing, mats etc. . . that said even if you stick to standards, you may not have the optimal size for the image itself. You have to define optimal first other wise youre asking a question like, what's the optimal size of a person. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justthings Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 <p>5x7 is the perfect size image for that size of paper.<br> ok.. so.. not really; i guess the point is.. whats the 'optimal' size of the image you are trying to make? I think some images scream to be printed big, others want a smaller size. In general I think that 'big' is good for standing back at looking at from a bit of a distance, smaller invites closer scrutiny and a more personal inspection of the image.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Shafer Posted August 15, 2009 Share Posted August 15, 2009 <p>Random thoughts:</p> <p>Same as most folks, probably, I crop so the picture looks best and let the aspect ratio fall where it may.</p> <p>When I do that, I often seem to end up with a square or close to it. My sensibilities may have been warped by too long association with YashicaMats in younger days and Hasselblads in later life.</p> <p>For hundreds of years, some artists have thought the so-called "golden ratio" is the ideal. The golden ratio is 1 to a specific irrational number, often represent by a lower case Greek phi (ψ), approximately equal to 1.618. Here's the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio">Wikipedia article</a>. It's skinnier than most common photo formats. Here's a picture cropped that way.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now