stephen_york3 Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 <p>This is an interesting question I haven't seen discussed. Other then the 10% decrease in focal length, do you lose anything by using a 180mm f/3.4 APO w/ 2x extender over the 400mm f/6.8? I understand the 180mm lens does well w/ the 2x extender, and for those mathematically challenged, the extender on the 180mm lens gives a 360mm/6.8.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doug herr Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 <p>I no longer have access to a 180mm f/3.4 APO so I can't do an optical test... but the biggest difference is handling. The 180 + extender would be best suited to use on a tripod, the 400mm f/6.8 is best without a tripod. The intended use of either lens would dictate which is more suitable much more than any optical differences.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTC Photography Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 <p>I still have the 400 and 180/3.4 APO, but I don't have a 2x extender, hence cannot do a side by side test. However from from ease of operation, I agree with Doug, the push pull mechanism of 400/6.8 is much faster in focusing, the rotating ring focusing mechanism of<br> 180/3.4 is slow in action</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_dunham Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 <p>I have used both these combinations. No longer have the 400/6.8 . This is what I remember. <br> The 400/6.8 was an excellent lens ..high IQ and designed for hand held use. Lightweight and breaks down for transport.<br> The 180/3.4 with the 2x lost quite a bit of contrast and resolution..personally I didn t like the IQ .<br> The 180/2x handles poorly with slow focus. The older 180/2.8 67mm handles much better . <br> The 180/2x was in my bag when I needed it at the 96 olympics and I got the gold medal winning vault from the 7th row .<br> The 180 2.8 apo and the 1.4apo extender (a lot more expensive) is a best in class solution.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_dunham Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 <p>I have used both these combinations. No longer have the 400/6.8 . This is what I remember. <br> The 400/6.8 was an excellent lens ..high IQ and designed for hand held use. Lightweight and breaks down for transport.<br> The 180/3.4 with the 2x lost quite a bit of contrast and resolution..personally I didn t like the IQ .<br> The 180/2x handles poorly with slow focus. The older 180/2.8 67mm handles much better . <br> The 180/2x was in my bag when I needed it at the 96 olympics and I got the gold medal winning vault from the 7th row .<br> The 180 2.8 apo and the 1.4apo extender (a lot more expensive) is a best in class solution.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_dunham Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 <p>I have used both these combinations. No longer have the 400/6.8 . This is what I remember. <br> The 400/6.8 was an excellent lens ..high IQ and designed for hand held use. Lightweight and breaks down for transport.<br> The 180/3.4 with the 2x lost quite a bit of contrast and resolution..personally I didn t like the IQ .<br> The 180/2x handles poorly with slow focus. The older 180/2.8 67mm handles much better . <br> The 180/2x was in my bag when I needed it at the 96 olympics and I got the gold medal winning vault from the 7th row .<br> The 180 2.8 apo and the 1.4apo extender (a lot more expensive) is a best in class solution.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_dunham Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 <p>I have used both these combinations. No longer have the 400/6.8 . This is what I remember. <br> The 400/6.8 was an excellent lens ..high IQ and designed for hand held use. Lightweight and breaks down for transport.<br> The 180/3.4 with the 2x lost quite a bit of contrast and resolution..personally I didn t like the IQ .<br> The 180/2x handles poorly with slow focus. The older 180/2.8 67mm handles much better . <br> The 180/2x was in my bag when I needed it at the 96 olympics and I got the gold medal winning vault from the 7th row .<br> The 180 2.8 apo and the 1.4apo extender (a lot more expensive) is a best in class solution.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_neuthaler Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 <p>Roger, you've had lots of lenses lots of times, apparently.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now