norbert_laasch Posted June 28, 2009 Share Posted June 28, 2009 <p>Hi,<br>my longest lens for my RB is the 210 APO and I consider it as a very suitable lens for portrait work (sometimes combined with a softener :-) ). But for many situations (esp. for nature and landscapes) the wish for a somewhat longer focal length is coming up in me and I think about looking for a 350 APO. Concernin this lens I have the following questions:<br>This lens is rather big and heavy. What about the practical use? Is the additional tripod holder really necessary? If yes, how should this lens be used with an extension tube (to shorten the minimum distance of 5 meters). If you are a user, would you buy this lens again? Or would you say that a 210 or 250 mm lens is enough for a RB?<br>Lookin forward to your answers, Norbert</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markbristol Posted June 28, 2009 Share Posted June 28, 2009 <p>Hi Norbert,<br> I have and use the 350 apo for the rz which is essentially the same but for the electronic shutter vs. mechanical shutter. I use this lens more than my 250 apo. I use it often with extension tubes and it works superbly. BUT I am a toolmaker and have designed and built my own extendable lens holder that will allow either or both tubes to be used. I don't think it would be a good idea to use tubes without some kind of support though I have often used the 350 with no tubes and no support without any ill effects. The reason I use it is that the longer focal lengths narrower depth of focus wide open and narrower field of view which works well for limiting distracting elements from the frame. If you hare handy with tools I could give you some ideas on how to extend the lens support bracket so tubes can be used.<br> Mark</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil_grant Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 <p>Why don't you investigate the earlier 360 C lens? - it is considerably lighter and requires no fiddly support bracket.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markbristol Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 <p>Neil's suggestion is actually quite good. I had a 360 at one time and is was quite sharp and due to the light weight could be used with the short tube without bending the front of my camera off when racked out all the way.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now