ruslan Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 <p>In our shops they cost approximately the same. Here comes my question - what camera gives better results, sharper images?<br> I have tasted LX-3 today - very good results! ISO 400 is good! Do not like its small tiny controls.<br> The most important question - is E520 better at ISO 800 (f5.6) than LX-3 at ISO200 (f2.8)?<br> Sharpness - is 14-45 zoom sharper at all stops that summicron of this Lumix? What would you recommend?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hermanvdc Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 <p>I have the LX3 and also the E510 They are complementary, you can't take a ps if you need a reflex. I like the lx3 wide lens but if I need the 150mm lens!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidlong Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 14-45 or 14-42? The current kit lens is the 14-42, and it's generally well-regarded. The older 14-45 is bigger and seemed to have a lot of variability in performance. Many copies were rather poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry_myers4 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 <p>The 14-54 is a mediocre lens, but I've certainly used worse (i.e. Canon 28-80). Does Olympus still sell the two lens kit with the 40-150? If so I would reccomend that- though the 40-150 obviously doesen't go as wide, its a bit faster and an all-around better lens. The 14-45 is certainly usable (expecially for beginners), but tends to yield very soft images and focuses slowly.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstarks Posted May 31, 2009 Share Posted May 31, 2009 <p>Generally speaking point and shoots tend to handle noise worse than a dSLR due to sensor size. I'm not sure if the E-520's noise at ISO-800 is the LX-3's equivalent at ISO-200. Regarding the 14-45 it should be okay if you find a good copy. I've had no issues with mine since I bought mine as a 2-lens kit in 2006. It doesn't focus super fast and it might not be that sharp for you (I have no issues). It or the 14-42 are great starter lenses and might be all the standard zoom you need.<br> <br /> Best of fortune to you,<br /> Jesse</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrraz Posted June 3, 2009 Share Posted June 3, 2009 <p>I must have gotten one of the good 14-45 lenses, when I bought my e-500 in 2006. I've continued to use it since. It's not a great lens, but I have no complaints about sharpness. I've never lost a shot because of lack of sharpness. I also use it on my e-510. Unless you're planning on action work, it focuses just fine.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 <p>Olympus have a lot of alternative standard zooms for the 4/3 system. The 14-42mm is probably the best low-cost option, the 12-60mm the best expensive option</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now