Jump to content

Printing files from M8.2


Recommended Posts

<p>I just made a few prints from my M8.2, ISO 360, JPEG fine, on my ten year old Epson Stylus Color 800 printer, in 8x10 size. The prints are very, very sharp, great tonality, but have the appearance of rather coarse grain, about like old Tri-X in D-76 or grainier. Is this likely to be due to the characteristics of the older printer, or likely to be due to some imcompatibility between M8.2 and printer, or actual grain from the 320 JPEG? Used Epson paper. </p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>First thing, much better to shoot DNG mode and convert to Tiff to print. That's what the Capture One software is for. And since you invested $5000 in a camera, you might seriously think about updating your printer.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Did you down-resolution them to a resolution appropriate to the printer? Did you sharpen them properly after down-resolutioning them? There's a lot of technique involved in getting a good digital workflow. Cruise the archives of the Digital Darkroom forum here.</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>It's probably the JPEG, as Ray says. You should never print from a JPEG if you have the option of shooting RAW or DNG and then converting to TIFF for print. It could also be the age of the printer because for a good print, you need to make sure you have the right printer profile downloaded for the paper you are using. If your printer is 10 years old, Epson might not supply that profile anymore.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Good choice with the 2880, don't know about the 1900, but you might try printing something from a DNG file first. M8 is not known for producing very good jpg files. If you need help on how to process DNG, let me know.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I have heard from people that use Epson printers all the time that the older the Epson printer, the more you will have to pay for the ink. This is admittedly hearsay, since I don't own an Epson printer myself, but apparently while you would pay more for a 2880, the ink would cost you less than for the 1900. I'm assuming this is Epson's way of getting you to buy a newer printer at a slightly higher cost. And of course, if that is their strategy, you could be spending more on ink anyway in 5 years no matter what printer you get. But I would look into how true that might be before you buy. Of course it really depends on how much printing you're planning on doing.</p>

<p>Both are great printers, btw. The 3-series Epson printers such as the 3800 are pretty cool because you can print both photo (ie. luster, glossy) and matte on the same printer. But you have to buy additional inks.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...