Uhooru Posted March 16, 2009 Share Posted March 16, 2009 <p>Isn't this more of a comparison of Apples and Oranges. I would think the better question is will the D300 retire the D300, or will the FX sensor retire the DX sensor. D700 is a different beast in terms of being full frame. It will not retire the Dx sensor if you believe what Nikon has to say. It does, put us cost concious consumers under pressure in terms of buying DX only lenses, especically in the wider ranges. However the 17-35, the fixed lengths and the 70-200 and other longer lenses work on both and are quality lenses. So the answer is, no the D700 won't, but the D300 might, or whatever comes after it. Unless you think Dx will kill Fx. Don't think it will, because in many applications on the long end of the focal world, the Dx gives you an advantage in reach, though an argument can be made that Fx will have a higher quality image. But for PJ work, the quality is quite good with these Dx cameras.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uhooru Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 <p>DOH, meant will 300 replace 200..</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffrey_prokopowicz Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 <p>Barry, I think we safely say that the D300 HAS replaced the D200.</p> <p>My question, though, was really specific to my situation. The advantages that DX has, mainly longer reach, macro, and lower cost, will always keep it in the game, I believe.</p> <p>Generically speaking though, you're right. Thanks.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_moynihan Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 <p>"The D200 isn't all that different from the D300. Also, the D200 is a MUCH better companion to a D700 than a D80 is. The D200 and D700 share; batteries, CF cards, ergonomics/controls, and the menus are pretty similar too.<br /><br />If I were you (trust me, I wish I could afford a D700) I would keep my D200 and ditch my D80."<br> Geez, that was almost exactly what i was going to type. I agree. The D200 is the one to keep, if the decision is that or the D80. I might add, the D200 has the lense compatability with the D700, a similar ais input into the menu, and it is commonly held that the metering on the D200 is very consistent (compared to the D80).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffrey_prokopowicz Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 <p>Hi Jay, no argument from me. Thanks.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_benner1 Posted March 20, 2009 Share Posted March 20, 2009 <p>Keep the D200 and get it modified for shooting infrared, thats what I am going to do with my old D200 when taxes come back.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_asprey2 Posted March 20, 2009 Share Posted March 20, 2009 <p>Yes, most certainly. And D300's are getting cheap on eBay too. I just got one for US$1k.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now