davidsimageline Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I always thought that to take a macro shot you need a macro lens. I bought this extension tube from china for $9 bucks and it works perfect. You have to manually focus the lens and also the aperture. I did a test on my sons lego and this is what I got with my D200 and a 28-70mm AF lens.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyinca Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 If you have a macro lens, you could have a tight macro portrait with auto aperture. Vivitar 100mm/2.8 macro with TC14A and an +5 diopter at a bit over 2:1.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 There are lots of ways to take closeups. In many cases the advantages of a dedicated macro lens won't be apparent. A purpose-designed macro lens reveals its advantages on flat field subjects such as document photography; when stopped down for maximum DOF without compromising too much on diffraction; minimal edge distortion and chromatic aberration. I'm probably overlooking a few significant advantages to a dedicated macro lens. But those advantages are not always readily apparent in some conditions. I don't always carry a macro lens in my bag, but usually have a closeup diopter to fit the lens filter threads. Sometimes that's good enough. Sometimes an extension tube works well enough with some lenses. For some folks nothing less than purpose-designed macro gear will do, right down to a focusing rail for their tripod heads. (Perfectly understandable if you've ever wrestled with the wrong equipment to attain precise alignments.) For the rest of us, close enough is close enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyal_v1 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I think you should separate between the two - using a low quality extension tube? not a problem, in order to get good results you just need it to be well attached to the lens, no hi-tech is really needed here. The lens is a different story - no matter how good the extension tube is, if the light enters through a 'bad' glass, it will affect the image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walterh Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Dave nice shot. You are quite right - often the motivation and the idea of a shot is the most important part. Perhaps you can motivate many to experiment. A small improvement of image quality may need a big increase in technique and money required. Often this is necessary - but often we see overkill especially in a tech forum .-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_in_PA Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Nice photo. and hilarious, too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graham_marsden Posted November 16, 2008 Share Posted November 16, 2008 Hi Dave. Could you provide a link to the source of the $9 extension tubes please? I'd love to have one in my lens bag. I don't think it would be a breach of forum rules because you are not actually advertising for them are you. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidsimageline Posted November 16, 2008 Author Share Posted November 16, 2008 Hi Graham pertaining to your question no I am not advertising for them. I bought mine from ebay once you go to ebay just type in nikon extension tube. It came from Hong Kong or China one out of the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now