theymademedoit Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Hi, I am looking for ways in which to improve my landscapes and make them more dramatic and give them more zing. I see many images that stand out and I wonder if anyone can give me some tips on how to achieve this. For info I shoot in RAW and have access to CS3 and photomatix. The images I produce don’t seem to cut it but with a little help I am sure they could be better. The 1st image below is my attempt and the one below is something that I aspire to be able to produce. Cheers for looking! Al<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 13, 2008 Author Share Posted October 13, 2008 Sorry.....<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobiasfeltus Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 the aspirational one may have been shot with a polarizer to increase the contrast in the sky, and reduce some reflections on the water. But I am not sure what makes a good landscape. what Ansel Adams did with exposure and processing, is most similar to HDR. This image you have posted has been sharpened a lot. it looks as though the sky were adjusted with a mask... so try Select/Color Range, sample the blue, slide until you have what you want, then add a new adjustment layer in Hue/Saturation, and it should take that selection as a mask, allowing you to darken, saturate and shift the blues. Do the same thing to the shadow areas of the image, maybe. have a meddle, but I would not dodge and burn, as that most often looks patchy. t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricklavoie Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 A bit of curve to add more contrast, a bit of saturation to the sky, a bit of sharpen and you got this;<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 13, 2008 Author Share Posted October 13, 2008 Hi, Thanks for the replies. I like what you did with the shot....much more pop. I am not to good with curves tho, I need to figure out how to use them......I know the basics but only just! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_smith4 Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 The way to learn is to practice. Now that you have the original and an edited version you can practice until you can do it yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricklavoie Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 let make it simple..if i can; 1_adjustment curve; press OK without doing anything. 2_change the blending mode to SOFT LIGHT, drop the opacity until you like the contrast..20-30? 3_adjustment hue saturation; 15% press OK 4_if you can, mask the bottom, if not all the image will just look to saturated overall. 5_apply a smart sharpen; 120%, radius 1, lens blur do not check more acurate. Simplier than this i would have to do it for you : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guido_h Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 > 5_apply a smart sharpen; 120%, radius 1, lens blur do not check more acurate. I read this "don't check more accurate" hint in a couple of other places too - can anyone explain why this is the preferred setting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricklavoie Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 checking it will make this amazing filter act like the less amazing USM : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam_r Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 <p>I completely agree with Patrick, smart sharpen is excellent, but "checking it will make this amazing filter act like the less amazing USM". Do not check the "more accurate box"!</p> <p>I just wanted to add that sometimes, when you have very nice graphic forms in an image, removing the color will make those forms stand out even more. You have some nice s-curves in this shot...</p> <img src="http://upload.pbase.com/image/104525435/original.jpg"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 14, 2008 Author Share Posted October 14, 2008 Thanks again for all this help. Patrick I appreciate the steps you have given and I will give it a try and post back the results. Pam, I think that looks great.....what was the colour work done with?<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 14, 2008 Author Share Posted October 14, 2008 Another thing I would like to ask (if not too much trouble), I am showing some of my work in a local art show in 4 weeks time and I am not sure which images to use. If you could cast your eyes over my gallery and let me know which ones if any are worthy that would be great. http://www.redbubble.com/people/theymademedoit I am open for suggestions on how to improve them so feel free. Regards, Al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 14, 2008 Author Share Posted October 14, 2008 Bump - Anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricklavoie Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 i have a quick look..heres my quick personnal view; 1_the bw look nice 2_the tone bw look nice 3_some color image look nice 4_some color image look wayyyyyy over saturated, sharpen and therefore i find it cheap looking..but this is you want a real nice color shot..if you want something unreal looking, you got it : ) 5_the framing look pretty good on most of the shot...some i could even buy to hang..and that a good things. heres the one i find too much.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricklavoie Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 just saw that one of them was post here..drop a bit the saturation and it should look better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 14, 2008 Author Share Posted October 14, 2008 Thanks for taking the time to look. I agree that they need to be toned down and thats what I shall do. Once I have made the changes I will report back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam_r Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 <p>I agree with Patrick. I think, in general, you just need a slightly lighter touch on the burning and saturation. The comps are very nice, you have a good eye. Here are my picks after a quick run through your galleries:</p> <p>Temple Church Bristol</p> <p>Tynemouth Priory</p> <p>Long Sands</p> <p>Door to Your Soul - very nice, rich texture</p> <p>Where did the bats go</p> <p>Arnos vale - beautiful</p> <p>Frame within a frame - I like it :-)</p> <p>Set in stone</p> <p>Enchanted tower - very nice comp. Maybe lighten up the top of the tower a little...or the sky surrounding it, not sure but that area is too dark. The rest...nice.</p> <p>Hope this helps :-)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 14, 2008 Author Share Posted October 14, 2008 Hi, I had a go....this time a new image from the same shoot and there is now no HDR and very little PP....in fact I used Nikon Capture instead of PS to convert the file and a little colour work, then into PS for curves, levels and smart shap......what doyou think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 14, 2008 Author Share Posted October 14, 2008 Hi, I had a go....this time a new image from the same shoot and there is now no HDR and very little PP....in fact I used Nikon Capture instead of PS to convert the file and a little colour work, then into PS for curves, levels and smart shap......what do you think?<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam_r Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 <p>It's a bit small to fully evaluate, but it looks great from here, Alan!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 14, 2008 Author Share Posted October 14, 2008 Thanks Pam....let me try again!<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pam_r Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 <p>Gorgeous! But a slight bit too much darkness on the bottom. Maybe try a more cinematic/panoramic crop. Something like this:</p> <p><img src="http://upload.pbase.com/image/104568460/original.jpg"></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 15, 2008 Author Share Posted October 15, 2008 Thanks again Pam.....I think this looks so much better!<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theymademedoit Posted October 16, 2008 Author Share Posted October 16, 2008 Hi again, Following everyones advice I have decided to re-process my images. The image below was taken in RAW I applied the steps that Patrick suggested - 1_adjustment curve; press OK without doing anything. 2_change the blending mode to SOFT LIGHT, drop the opacity until you like the contrast..20-30? 3_adjustment hue saturation; 15% press OK 4_if you can, mask the bottom, if not all the image will just look to saturated overall. 5_apply a smart sharpen; 120%, radius 1, lens blur do not check more accurate. I actually added less saturation on this one. Even the untouched RAW file was very vibrant. Suggestions and comments welcome! Regards, Al<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryrock Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 I edited your original photo with Lucis Pro 6.0 and mixed it 50% with the original.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now