scott_mills Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 I just got this lens a few weeks ago and I really like it. I just thought the BG blur in this photo looked odd, more like a PS blur . To me it looks like I tried to add the blur post, it looks "fake" to me. What do you think? Maybe I'm just not used to have big, smooth structures in the BG (usually leaves and such). Here's a 100% crop.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben_quinn1 Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 I agree with you but perhaps the back ground is a little over exposed, do you hvae a shot with a lower exposure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Is from a jpeg? It could be "post-processing" (at least, non-lens) in the settings on what kind of compression, sharpening, etc. you've got on the camera. Does it show up in a RAW image? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_mills Posted August 26, 2008 Author Share Posted August 26, 2008 Ben - The BG is a little over as I was exposing for the backlit subject. I don't have any other exposures of the same shot. JDM - It's the Rebel XTi's default settings which always seem fine to me, never got this look before. I shot this one jpg only and do not have a RAW for it. I did do some post on this but it looked the same right out of the camera. The only PS I did on this was a very minor levels adjustment (maybe moved the black slider 1/8 inch if that) and USM at 150%/1.0/2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Well, I think that you may have run into the extreme difference at the edge between a really overexposed (clipped) sky and the dark of the shadowed wall and pipe. It was just too much, I'm betting, for the normal algorithm to work as usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisjb Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 Could it be the sharpening technique? I rarely use USM, (mainly it sharpens overall and don`t want flat tone areas sharper like sky) I use either high pass filter, or Smart sharpen as you are using CS3, generally have mine 140/1/0 using `lens blur, seems to work far better than USM, I believe rebels sharper in parameters for jpeg maybe drop it back and select sharpen in PS :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted August 27, 2008 Share Posted August 27, 2008 In any case, I guess all I and the others are saying is that we don't think it is the lens per se, but rather what is happening in an extreme contrast situation in the settings, etc. for the jpg _in the camera_.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now