Jump to content

How is my post-processing


Recommended Posts

Original is the first image, edited is the second. I only want to maintain the natural appearance of the scene,

as if you were to see it with your own eyes. I used levels adjustment, curves, color-balance and lonestar digital

sharpening.

 

<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v608/Liono/?action=view&current=1.jpg" target="_blank"><img

src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v608/Liono/1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

 

<a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v608/Liono/?action=view&current=2-2.jpg" target="_blank"><img

src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v608/Liono/2-2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it looks pretty good. Very nice sheep. :)

 

I took the liberty of using your original image and making some adjustments of my own. I hope you dont mind.

 

I tried to keep it natural looking. The biggest change I made was a crop. Other adjustments were relatively minor.<div>00QV9y-64099584.jpg.d43d816410736256da22146775a9b6d7.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I added a bit of sharpening and clarity. I debated about whether or not it looked oversharpened. One issue is that we

now have a much closer crop, and I needed to make the trees in the foreground and the background defined, and had to

do that with clarity and sharpening - which because I am using LR 1.4, was a global adjustment. I would have preferred

to selectively apply it. They looked very soft after the crop without any adjustment.

 

I might have overdone it though. Probably shouldnt edit late at night with tired eyes.

 

I made exposure adjustments, fill light, etc, a very slight brightness and contrast adjustment, miniscule white balance

adjustment, minor curves adjustment - and I think that is it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The color looks better than mine, which has a very slight red bias. I think I may be over relying on color balance, since it seems I can never get it quite right anyhow.

 

What do you mean by fill light and white balance adjustment, in photoshop terms? And people do use brightness/contrast after all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use brightness and contrast sometimes. Dont know if other people do. I'm an amateur though, so take that into account I guess.

:|

<br><br>

I dont use photoshop so I'm not sure what terms to use. If you use Adobe Camera Raw, the terms should be the same as my Lightroom terms.

<br><br>Fill light

basically lets you recover detail in dark areas, in this case parts of the trees. Recovery lets you recover highlight detail, in this

case the sky. White balance is the temperature and tint of the photo. For example, your camera probably has various white

balance settings for cloudy, daylight, tungsten, etc. I'm sure there is a thread on this forum (if you do a search you should find it)

that explains this much better than I could. I dont want to accidentally say something wrong, so I wont say too much on the

subject. But essentially, you can use white balance to warm or cool your photo.

<br><br>

I'll list all the Lightroom Adjustments I made (to the last version) below:

<br><br>

- I cropped the photo<br><br>

- I did a +2 adjustment to the white balance<br><br>

- For exposure adjustments I put recovery to 89 and fill light to 18<br><br>

- I set brightness to -6 and contrast to -9<br><br>

- Tone curve adjustments are highlights +19, lights +4, darks -6 and shadows -13<br><br>

- Hue adjustments are Yellow +2 and Green -17<br><br>

- Saturation adjustment of green -6<br><br>

- Luminance adjustment of green -47<br><br>

<br><br>

I think that covers everything I did.

<br><br>

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...